Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Single Seater Racing > Formula One

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 13 Jun 2004, 22:05 (Ref:1002961)   #1
bulldogspirit
Racer
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
United Kingdom
London, England
Posts: 221
bulldogspirit should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Williams & Toyota DQ'd

BBC Sport reports Williams & Toyota disqualified from Canadian GP for illegal cooling ducts. More details soon.
bulldogspirit is offline  
Quote
Old 13 Jun 2004, 22:11 (Ref:1002967)   #2
Fondmetal
Rookie
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 89
Fondmetal should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
???? wtf?
Fondmetal is offline  
Quote
Old 13 Jun 2004, 22:12 (Ref:1002968)   #3
Sodemo
Veteran
 
Sodemo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
United Kingdom
Solihull, West Mids, UK
Posts: 11,177
Sodemo has a real shot at the podium!Sodemo has a real shot at the podium!Sodemo has a real shot at the podium!Sodemo has a real shot at the podium!Sodemo has a real shot at the podium!
They had illegal brake ducts or something, just read it over on autosport.com
Sodemo is online now  
Quote
Old 13 Jun 2004, 22:15 (Ref:1002969)   #4
esorniloc
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location:
England
Posts: 1,409
esorniloc should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
So Glock gets 2 points on his debut?

Will Toyota or Williams appeal?

Last edited by esorniloc; 13 Jun 2004 at 22:16.
esorniloc is offline  
Quote
Old 13 Jun 2004, 22:17 (Ref:1002970)   #5
Hazard
Veteran
 
Hazard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
Posts: 5,710
Hazard should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridHazard should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridHazard should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Yep, BBC reports a problem with the teams brake ducts on post race inspection - no specifics.

The amended result is...

1. M Schumacher
2. R Barrichello
3. J Button
4. G Fisichella
5. K Raikonnen
6. D Coulthard
7. T Glock
8. N Heidfeld

F1Racing are reporting the result as though Panis still scores, though BBC says Glock finishes 7th, which doesn't make sense

Last edited by Hazard; 13 Jun 2004 at 22:18.
Hazard is offline  
Quote
Old 13 Jun 2004, 22:20 (Ref:1002972)   #6
Katieknight1984
Rookie
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location:
kent, england
Posts: 51
Katieknight1984 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
*News Flash* Williams and Toyota Disqualified!!!

Its understood that both the Williams of Ralf Schumacher and Juan Pablo Montoya,and the Toyota's of Olivier Panis and Cristiano Da Matta have been excluded from the results of the Canadian GP.

Its understood that after the race it was discovered that the brake ducts on the Williams and Toyota's were found not to comply with the regualtions.
Its not known at this stage wheather either team will appeal.

With that it alters the results with barrichello moving from 3rd to 2nd and button get another 3rd place after originally finishing 4th,fisi from 6th to 4th,kimi from 7th to 5th,dc from 9th to 6th,glock from 11th to 7th,heidfeld from 12th to 8th,klien from 13th to 9th and baumgartner from 14th to 10th.
Katieknight1984 is offline  
__________________
There must be times when Joann Villeneuve still doubts her wisdom in letting Jacques step in to that little kart at Imola all those years ago, but race fans around the world are eternally grateful, for in Jacques we have a racer of the old school, and a legend in his own right.
Quote
Old 13 Jun 2004, 22:22 (Ref:1002974)   #7
bulldogspirit
Racer
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
United Kingdom
London, England
Posts: 221
bulldogspirit should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/moto...ne/3803709.stm

Sounds like no appeal likely from Williams.
bulldogspirit is offline  
Quote
Old 13 Jun 2004, 22:27 (Ref:1002975)   #8
Dani Filth
Race Official
Veteran
 
Dani Filth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Romania
Bucharest
Posts: 7,618
Dani Filth should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridDani Filth should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridDani Filth should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
although if they were illegal .they must be penalised .... it's shame really ..
Dani Filth is offline  
__________________
Apocalypse becomes creation / Gor-Gor shall erase the nation
Before you leap into his gizzard / Fall and worship Tyrant lizard

Ciao Marco
Quote
Old 13 Jun 2004, 22:27 (Ref:1002976)   #9
Damon
Veteran
 
Damon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
United Kingdom
Hampshire, England
Posts: 5,577
Damon should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Bloody hell! That's the most exciting F1 related event of the weekend.
Damon is offline  
__________________
Brought to you by Glagnar's Human Rinds: "A-bunch-a-munch-crunch-a-human"
Quote
Old 13 Jun 2004, 22:28 (Ref:1002977)   #10
Hazard
Veteran
 
Hazard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
Posts: 5,710
Hazard should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridHazard should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridHazard should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
The Williams statement seems fishy to me. Now we're awarded with another Ferrari 1-2.

I suppose it actually makes the championship closer, now Michael only has a 16 point lead instead of 18 - and I suppose Button not Ralf is the only threat

Last edited by Hazard; 13 Jun 2004 at 22:29.
Hazard is offline  
Quote
Old 13 Jun 2004, 22:31 (Ref:1002978)   #11
Damon
Veteran
 
Damon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
United Kingdom
Hampshire, England
Posts: 5,577
Damon should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Unfortunately you've been beaten to it! I feel a merge coming on...
Damon is offline  
__________________
Brought to you by Glagnar's Human Rinds: "A-bunch-a-munch-crunch-a-human"
Quote
Old 13 Jun 2004, 22:45 (Ref:1002984)   #12
Kicking-back
Registered User
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
Kicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridKicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Rules infringed, they're disqualified, they've accepted it.

No big worries - and attention can move on to Indianapolis now.
Kicking-back is offline  
Quote
Old 13 Jun 2004, 23:10 (Ref:1002996)   #13
Rennen
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
United Kingdom
Hertfordshire
Posts: 2,056
Rennen should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridRennen should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridRennen should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridRennen should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Seems odd to have a rule that limits airflow to just cool something!
Rennen is offline  
Quote
Old 13 Jun 2004, 23:19 (Ref:1003003)   #14
Spudgun
Race Official
Veteran
 
Spudgun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
England
Reading, UK
Posts: 2,776
Spudgun should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridSpudgun should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridSpudgun should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
I really am not amused. Surely the teams should be able to run what ever cooling they like. Increased cooling lowers performance surely!

But rules are rules I guess.
Spudgun is offline  
__________________
Successfully crashing a probe into the moon is like saying you successfully swam the English Channel by having your corpse wash up on the beach.
Quote
Old 13 Jun 2004, 23:27 (Ref:1003007)   #15
gttouring
Veteran
 
gttouring's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location:
USB 3.0
Posts: 4,536
gttouring should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
i would like to see the rules pertaining towards coolant or brake ducting sizes...
what an odd thing to break the rules on, and what a wierd thing they didn't catch postqualifying or in parc ferme, or something...if you are going to cheat they should have put turbos on the V10 and soked the field and get DQ'd for something really big
gttouring is offline  
__________________
SuperTrucks rule- end of story.
Listen to my ramblings! Follow my twitter @davidAET
I am shameless ...
Quote
Old 13 Jun 2004, 23:42 (Ref:1003013)   #16
pirenzo
Veteran
 
pirenzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
United Kingdom
London, UK
Posts: 10,241
pirenzo should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridpirenzo should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridpirenzo should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by Spudgun
I really am not amused. Surely the teams should be able to run what ever cooling they like. Increased cooling lowers performance surely!

But rules are rules I guess.
no, increased cooling would mean that the drivers wouldn't have to watch their brakes as much so could brake harder in the race.
pirenzo is offline  
Quote
Old 13 Jun 2004, 23:43 (Ref:1003014)   #17
grumpy1
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 639
grumpy1 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by Spudgun
I really am not amused. Surely the teams should be able to run what ever cooling they like. Increased cooling lowers performance surely!

But rules are rules I guess.
In therory by having larger intakes it creates faster cooling therefor allowing the driver to go deeper when braking.As I said in theroy but when it comes to the crunch it depends how big the drivers cahoonas are as to whether he will us this advantage.
Not a very good start for young Sam now is it.

The Grumpy1

P.S.Doh beaten to it.

Last edited by grumpy1; 13 Jun 2004 at 23:45.
grumpy1 is offline  
Quote
Old 13 Jun 2004, 23:58 (Ref:1003019)   #18
Gt_R
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location:
Singapore
Posts: 5,917
Gt_R should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridGt_R should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
I'm quite surprised that any top teams would flout the rules, but on a circuit as tough as Montreal on the brakes, such illegal modifications would play quite a significant difference in the race.

Unfortunately, punishments have to be met out..but i do feel sorry for Ralf

It's strange that coincidentally, 2 works supported teams were found to breach the rules in the same way on the same race.
Gt_R is offline  
__________________
Alonso: "McLaren and Williams are also great racing teams, but Ferrari is the biggest one that you can go to."
Quote
Old 14 Jun 2004, 00:02 (Ref:1003020)   #19
Spudgun
Race Official
Veteran
 
Spudgun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
England
Reading, UK
Posts: 2,776
Spudgun should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridSpudgun should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridSpudgun should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
p and grumpy1,

I do see your point, and it is a very fair one.
However, if the teams are allowed to have fancy electronics on engines and such, for example rev limiters and traction control to prevent potential problems, reliabiltity and binabilty why can't they cool the brakes as they see fit?

After all, these days are the last of the late brakers. If everyone is always looking after their brakes, passing gets difficult and that is a big problem at the mo.

The tyres are so good now you need good brakes.

15-20 years ago the whole car had to be looked after. Why now just the brakes?

If they want to curb brakes, make steel discs mandatory.

Sorry, but I agree to disagree here. Stupid rule.
Spudgun is offline  
__________________
Successfully crashing a probe into the moon is like saying you successfully swam the English Channel by having your corpse wash up on the beach.
Quote
Old 14 Jun 2004, 00:20 (Ref:1003027)   #20
grumpy1
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 639
grumpy1 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I never said it was a good rule.There have to be limitations on the whole thing.Carbon Fibre brakes are the natural progression to where these cars are at performance wise.The old steel rotors would melt if subjected to the cars of today.
The rule on the diamentions is the same for all teams so it is only natural that if you bend the rule your penilised.It would be the same if they ran a larger front wing.Illegal advantage same result.

The Grumpy1
grumpy1 is offline  
Quote
Old 14 Jun 2004, 01:27 (Ref:1003042)   #21
Inigo Montoya
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
 
Inigo Montoya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Canada
Toronto, Canada
Posts: 5,181
Inigo Montoya has a real shot at the championship!Inigo Montoya has a real shot at the championship!Inigo Montoya has a real shot at the championship!Inigo Montoya has a real shot at the championship!Inigo Montoya has a real shot at the championship!Inigo Montoya has a real shot at the championship!
Some red faces for Gasgoine and Michaels for sure. Tough luck, but I guess that brings my boy up to 4th!
Inigo Montoya is offline  
__________________
"And the most important thing is that we, the Vettels, the Bernies, whoever, should not destroy our own sport by making stupid comments about the ******* noise." - Niki Lauda
Quote
Old 14 Jun 2004, 01:50 (Ref:1003048)   #22
Wrex
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
 
Wrex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Australia
Melbourne - Home of the Australian GP
Posts: 7,643
Wrex is going for a new lap record!Wrex is going for a new lap record!Wrex is going for a new lap record!Wrex is going for a new lap record!Wrex is going for a new lap record!Wrex is going for a new lap record!
Firstly, I wonder if those sympathetic to Williams here would be the same had it been Michael & Rubins cars caught with an illegal modification? I think not.

Anyway, I agree it does sound like a silly rule, but there is no doubt more too it that we are aware. And if open break cooling was allowed, the other cars in the field may have been faster as well.

In short, do the crime, pay the fine.


I find it amazing that a team as profesional as Williams would be caught out by this, very weird. Someone's head needs to be served up.

And Toyota as well? If this is true someone should go back and check the F1-2003GA then, maybe its results can be challenged.
Wrex is offline  
__________________
#Keepfightingmichael
Quote
Old 14 Jun 2004, 02:24 (Ref:1003063)   #23
grumpy1
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 639
grumpy1 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by Wrex
Firstly, I wonder if those sympathetic to Williams here would be the same had it been Michael & Rubins cars caught with an illegal modification? I think not.

Anyway, I agree it does sound like a silly rule, but there is no doubt more too it that we are aware. And if open break cooling was allowed, the other cars in the field may have been faster as well.

In short, do the crime, pay the fine.


I find it amazing that a team as profesional as Williams would be caught out by this, very weird. Someone's head needs to be served up.

And Toyota as well? If this is true someone should go back and check the F1-2003GA then, maybe its results can be challenged.
Point 1. Don't start me Wrex.Most should know my veiw on that.
Point 2. Its the same for all so tough.
Point 3. Agreed break the rules cop it sweat.
Point 4. What are you suggesting Wrex Ferrari broke the rules?

The Grumpy1
grumpy1 is offline  
Quote
Old 14 Jun 2004, 02:34 (Ref:1003067)   #24
marcus
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
 
marcus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Australia
Australia
Posts: 12,053
marcus has a real shot at the podium!marcus has a real shot at the podium!marcus has a real shot at the podium!marcus has a real shot at the podium!
OOPS !!!!!!!!!!!!
marcus is offline  
__________________
In Loving memory of Peter Brock
I hate it when im driving in a straight line & Seb Vettel runs into me
GO THE MIGHTY HAWKS !!!!
Quote
Old 14 Jun 2004, 02:39 (Ref:1003071)   #25
fast95pony
Veteran
 
fast95pony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Canada
Calgary,Alberta,Canada
Posts: 565
fast95pony should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
This cooling infraction makes me hot under the collar.I lost a point in the competition !!
fast95pony is offline  
__________________
Six out of seven dwarfs aren't Happy..
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New For Toyota Tf105 Formula One 1 15 Jul 2005 22:30
Williams and Toyota - going backwards? Sodemo Formula One 9 14 Jun 2005 13:13
What will Toyota do??? Dov IRL Indycar Series 50 19 Oct 2004 23:10
Mikey should have been DQ'd Lizzerd ChampCar World Series 34 21 May 2000 05:32


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:47.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.