Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Saloon & Sportscar Racing > Sportscar & GT Racing > 24 Heures du Mans

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 9 Jul 2007, 14:56 (Ref:1958703)   #51
jhansen
Veteran
 
jhansen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
United States
California
Posts: 6,699
jhansen should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridjhansen should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridjhansen should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by sssssssss
the audi r8 was one of the best racecars ever.
True. But the Zytek had superior pace to the R8. Dyson also showed that the R8 could be beaten. Had more serious efforts been around earlier the R8 might have won less. But then again, the car may have evolved further and quicker. We'll never know.

Hopefully, we'll see Porsche in P1 sooner rather than later. Porsche vs. Audi is a battle I'd love to see.
jhansen is offline  
__________________
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein
Quote
Old 9 Jul 2007, 15:17 (Ref:1958729)   #52
Speed-King
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location:
Wuerzburg,Germany
Posts: 7,325
Speed-King has a real shot at the podium!Speed-King has a real shot at the podium!Speed-King has a real shot at the podium!Speed-King has a real shot at the podium!
Quote:
Originally Posted by jhansen
Hopefully, we'll see Porsche in P1 sooner rather than later. Porsche vs. Audi is a battle I'd love to see.
Well, I see it right now, and I love what I see...
Speed-King is offline  
Quote
Old 9 Jul 2007, 16:38 (Ref:1958815)   #53
paul-collins
Veteran
 
paul-collins's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Canada
Mosport on a good day
Posts: 5,147
paul-collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridpaul-collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridpaul-collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by jhansen
True. But the Zytek had superior pace to the R8. Dyson also showed that the R8 could be beaten. Had more serious efforts been around earlier the R8 might have won less. But then again, the car may have evolved further and quicker.
For those who wonder where the R8 would stand relative to previous competition, I remind you that the R8 held the post-chicane distance record before the R10 claimed it last year.

As jhansen points out, there's a good chance that the R8 would have simply evolved more over the life of the car, if they had've been challenged. There was no engine development - beyond remapping for new restrictors - after 2003.
paul-collins is offline  
__________________
... Since all men live in darkness, who believes something is not a test of whether it is true or false. I have spent years trying to get people to ask simple questions: What is the evidence, and what does it mean?

-Bill James
Quote
Old 9 Jul 2007, 19:17 (Ref:1958958)   #54
sssssssss
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 972
sssssssss should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridsssssssss should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by jhansen
True. But the Zytek had superior pace to the R8. Dyson also showed that the R8 could be beaten. Had more serious efforts been around earlier the R8 might have won less. But then again, the car may have evolved further and quicker. We'll never know.

Hopefully, we'll see Porsche in P1 sooner rather than later. Porsche vs. Audi is a battle I'd love to see.
The Zytek did not have superior pace to the R8. It reached higher top speeds, but for sure it wasn't nearly that quick over an entire lap, not to mention an entire race. Audi always won with sufficient gap over all of its competitors, and that can only be translated by superior pace of the R8 over the others. In addition, the best lap of the 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2004 races was set by an Audi R8. Bentley had the fastest pace in 2003 and Pescarolo in 2005, but none of them went nearly as quick as the 2002 R8 (over 3:32 for both Bentley and Pescarolo vs. 3:29 by the 2002 R8).
In fact, like I already mentioned, NO LMP CAR ever was as quick in race pace or qualifying times as the last official Audi team R8 (the 2002 model). Except for top speed, where it was always 2nd or 3rd best, the R8 surpassed the competition with incredible ease on any given criteria. Especially pace.
In actuality, the 2002 R8 was not surpassed even by the R10, given that the fastest times and speeds of the R10 in 2007 are on a over 3 sec. faster track config. The 2006 R10, which raced on the same track configuration as the R8 and with about the same competition (Pescarolos, Domes etc) was slightly slower than the 2002 R8 in qualifying and had just about the same insane pace. Again, nobody surpassed Audi in pace by now in LMP, from 1999 to 2007. The 2003-2005 variants of the R8 were all seriously slowed down from the original R8 (2000-2002). But the official R8 was the fastest LMP. Period!

Last edited by sssssssss; 9 Jul 2007 at 19:23.
sssssssss is offline  
Quote
Old 9 Jul 2007, 19:55 (Ref:1958996)   #55
jhansen
Veteran
 
jhansen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
United States
California
Posts: 6,699
jhansen should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridjhansen should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridjhansen should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Actually you're correct, at Le Mans the R8 probably did not have any peers. Maybe the Bentley would be one. Had the Bentley been able to run to 2002 restrictors it could have topped the R8's lap time.

Edit: In fact, the Bentley ran two more laps than the works Audi of 2002.

But the Zytek ate the R8 for lunch on shorter tracks.

Last edited by jhansen; 9 Jul 2007 at 20:00.
jhansen is offline  
__________________
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein
Quote
Old 9 Jul 2007, 20:26 (Ref:1959030)   #56
ss_collins
Veteran
 
ss_collins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Nigeria
Mooresville, NC
Posts: 6,704
ss_collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridss_collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridss_collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridss_collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Top speed wise the Dome S101 was always top dog pretty much. I'd like to see a Dome developed Honda at Le Mans - now that would be super quick!
ss_collins is offline  
__________________
Chase the horizon
Quote
Old 9 Jul 2007, 20:34 (Ref:1959038)   #57
duke_toaster
Veteran
 
duke_toaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
European Union
Englandland
Posts: 5,100
duke_toaster should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridduke_toaster should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
The only way we would be able to see them race eachother is to give the LMP2s a little less weight and/or bigger air restrictor holes to merge the two classes
duke_toaster is offline  
Quote
Old 9 Jul 2007, 22:38 (Ref:1959142)   #58
chewymonster
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 626
chewymonster should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Yep, the road going R8 has matched up very well against the 911, winning many comparisons.

Just hope that Porsche doesn't try to interfere with the road going R8 and future high power Audis.
chewymonster is offline  
Quote
Old 10 Jul 2007, 02:24 (Ref:1959225)   #59
ThePenguin
Veteran
 
ThePenguin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
United States
United States
Posts: 620
ThePenguin should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
With Porsche and Audi becoming so close together now, I doubt that we will see those two companies competing against one another in Le Mans. It could be that they may have a joint project in the future, instead of competing against one another.
ThePenguin is offline  
Quote
Old 11 Jul 2007, 19:05 (Ref:1960928)   #60
sssssssss
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 972
sssssssss should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridsssssssss should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
in fact, porsche and audi are pretty obvious in avoiding direct competition indeed. they always were hand in hand. most probably we'll see porsche again in top category at le mans when audi temporarily retires. they might interchange and alternate from now on, for they have seen they are 2 extremely powerful voices now instead of one, as audi has proved just as competitive as porsche.
as a side remark, i noticed the latest years of porsche at LM (especially the year 1998) they were running already on this new type of a setup (higher downforce, more stability, more stamina and slightly less top speed) that audi has imposed as standard, as none can compete against them if they don't embrace it too. so it's again pretty obvious audi are inheriting porsche's knowledge for sportscar racing, and, form now on, maybe viceversa too
sssssssss is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Le Mans MOTO 24 Happy Snapper Motorsport Art & Photography 2 14 May 2007 10:45
RML MG Lola for 1000km Le Mans, LMES and Le Mans 24 hour 2004 Wout ACO Regulated Series 21 27 Sep 2003 15:26
[LM24] When do you think Porsche will return to Le Mans? H16 24 Heures du Mans 3 14 Nov 2001 10:38
[LM24] Le Mans: Barbour Porsche DQ'ed Heeltoe6 24 Heures du Mans 6 27 Jul 2000 23:40
Porsche 917K and Le Mans Mephisto Motorsport History 15 10 May 2000 18:19


All times are GMT. The time now is 13:23.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.