|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
17 Nov 2012, 06:36 (Ref:3167343) | #1 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 413
|
Who decides the "time certain' finish?
So who is responsible for this "time certain" BS?
Ch 7? V8 Supercars? The tea lady? I wrote- yes snail mail ( come on 7, move into the 1990s) to 7 after we were shafted on the Gold Coast. They deny responsibility, blaming V8 Supercars. So whose BS decision is it? They had plenty of time after the race to show a highlights package. Mind you, frosty benefited from the race being shy of a lap. |
||
__________________
You in the Camry. The world won't end if you press a bit harder on the accelerator. (its the tall skinny pedal on the right) And FFS use the indicators! |
17 Nov 2012, 07:32 (Ref:3167357) | #2 | ||
Race Official
1% Club
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 47,637
|
The races are scheduled to finish at or before 5.15pm on Saturdays of race weekends.
This is written into the supp regs of the meeting, and well known by all and sundry I imagine that today's snafu in the utes caused the start of the V8Supercar race to be delayed, plus the safety car period, meant the race could not finish its full complement of laps before the 5.15pm timeframe. |
||
__________________
Here’s hoping a random universe works out in your favour… The meaning of life… ENJOYING THE PASSAGE OF TIME! Our business is one of constant crisis interrupted by brief periods of intense success. Go woke, Go broke… #CANCERSUCKS #GOCHIKO |
17 Nov 2012, 08:30 (Ref:3167373) | #3 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,381
|
I thought it was based on allow Skaifey time to get to the pub and shout the bar?
|
|
|
17 Nov 2012, 08:41 (Ref:3167379) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 761
|
Things such as fitting in to TV (Tv screen time is very important) The rules the track has to operate under to meet local noise rules, things like that.
So I reckon the reasons could vary depending on circuit. If I had to put my money on one though, it would be to fit TV scheduling |
||
|
17 Nov 2012, 08:45 (Ref:3167382) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 523
|
I thought that it had to finish at that time, so as to give everyone time to get home and watch a replay of another FPR stuffup. Brilliant.
|
||
|
17 Nov 2012, 09:16 (Ref:3167391) | #6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,511
|
Years ago I was at Oran Park with some mates and had a scanner tuned in to race control. Every second transmission was "ask channel 10 if we can......."
|
||
__________________
What if there were no hypothetical questions? |
17 Nov 2012, 09:59 (Ref:3167410) | #7 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 250
|
It's written in the supp. regs, to meet the requirements of the TV broadcaster. The race finish time of 17.15 + 1 lap gives the TV time to do a couple of interviews post race.
Even Bathurst has a time limit, 161 laps or 17.15 + 1 lap. If we had bad weather we could have a Supercheap Auto's Bathurst 950. |
||
__________________
IF YOU CAN'T FIX IT WITH A HAMMER, YOU'VE GOT AN ELECTRICAL PROBLEM! |
17 Nov 2012, 10:46 (Ref:3167433) | #8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,030
|
I saw one of DV_08's videos, 1986 Sandown ATCC. Even that race, as far back as then, was cut short as a result of tv. I'm not sure why or what excuse was available in those days though. Also, it's ridiculous that Bathurst is under time constraints as well, it should be exempted from it. They may as well do it, because the first time it occurs, there will be a huge uproar.
|
||
|
17 Nov 2012, 11:57 (Ref:3167475) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 523
|
I might not be the brightest, but would it be a lot easier to start earlier, like 45 minutes earlier. Then most things would be covered.
|
||
|
17 Nov 2012, 20:59 (Ref:3167612) | #10 | |
Veteran
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 16,040
|
then if there are no issues it finishes too early and the tv coverage has to fill in 45 minutes at the end which they dont want to do
|
|
|
17 Nov 2012, 23:44 (Ref:3167662) | #11 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 523
|
Well then it falls back to the TV mob, they are paying the dollars to cover it, so the easiest way, delay the telecast for 45 minutes that has been done many a time before. THe coverage is still of a full race distance and everyone is happy.
|
||
|
17 Nov 2012, 23:57 (Ref:3167665) | #12 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,369
|
Quote:
Ch7 covered the whole afternoon of racing live in those days (support races and all), and the ATCC race was reduced from 25 to 21 laps. Quote:
Ch7 can't win. |
|||
|
17 Nov 2012, 23:58 (Ref:3167666) | #13 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 123
|
Then we all ***** that the race is not live and I can get the results from Natsoft or Bigpond (for the next 3 races anyway).
|
||
|
18 Nov 2012, 00:04 (Ref:3167669) | #14 | ||||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,530
|
Quote:
Quote:
Sometimes life is like that, you have to be careful what you wish for, because once you get it the reality isn't anything like what you expected. |
||||
|
18 Nov 2012, 01:07 (Ref:3167683) | #15 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 523
|
Well I am no doubt a lot older than you, if you are really interested in watching it on TV, even if it is only 20 minutes delayed, have you ever heard of the OFF button on the computer, why not try that then you wont know who wins until the TV is finished. Brilliant idea.
|
||
|
18 Nov 2012, 02:07 (Ref:3167689) | #16 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 123
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
18 Nov 2012, 02:59 (Ref:3167697) | #17 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 523
|
One other option, if Foxtel bid high enough it would not matter what time the telecast finished, oh but hang on people could not afford it, because they have computer i pads and all that stuff.
|
||
|
18 Nov 2012, 07:28 (Ref:3167752) | #18 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 413
|
Quote:
Ch 7 is my bet. Ch 9 manage to do a cross from the cricket to the "sacred cow"- the 6 PM news. Heaven forbid that any of 7's regular programming could be moved, even 5 minutes for motorsport. WTF can't 7? |
|||
__________________
You in the Camry. The world won't end if you press a bit harder on the accelerator. (its the tall skinny pedal on the right) And FFS use the indicators! |
18 Nov 2012, 07:38 (Ref:3167756) | #19 | |
Veteran
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 16,040
|
Why did todays race go over time? It was due for a 5.15 finish. but we finished after that.
Maybe Lowndes scrapped in by a few seconds. The real problem we have is not timed finishes, Its starts that are too close to the finish time. Even at Bathurst we are getting close to a timed finish, they allow 6 hours and 45 minutes for Bathurst now (which may include the warm up (i dont actually look at a clock around start time). this would mean we missed about 6 laps in 2006 and 5 races since V8Supercar took over would not have finished |
|
|
18 Nov 2012, 08:44 (Ref:3167775) | #20 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 7,396
|
If Ch7 are dictating when the races should finish, yes there is a problem and V8SC should be taking a serious look at it. The fans are clearly not happy with it.
However, if the local council or whatever say when on-track activities must cease, then what can you do? |
|
|
18 Nov 2012, 09:26 (Ref:3167793) | #21 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 201
|
Time certain finishes started when Channel 10 was doing the telecast, they advised V8 supercars that they had to go to the news at 5pm and V8s accepted this and they had put it into the sup regs ever since. If you go back I am sure the first race that was affected by this was the Sandown 500
|
||
|
18 Nov 2012, 11:01 (Ref:3167836) | #22 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,733
|
Quote:
The issue as I see it now is that each race has a time certain finish & they're cutting it too fine - doesn't take much at all for the timed finish to come into play. |
|||
__________________
“We’re far from having too much horsepower…[m]y definition of too much horsepower is when all four wheels are spinning in every gear.” ― Mark Donohue |
18 Nov 2012, 11:59 (Ref:3167864) | #23 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,645
|
The incident in the ute race had no bearing on the time certain finish, the ute race was canned/moved to later in the day and that nicely managed the time gap. The race simply wasn't run as fast as predicted, for whatever reasons.
|
||
__________________
Supercars isn't the sport. The sport is motor racing. |
18 Nov 2012, 12:04 (Ref:3167869) | #24 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,369
|
Quote:
The 1989 ATCC race format consisted of time certain 60min races, dropping to 50mins in 1990. Plus there was the earlier mentioned 1986 ATCC round at Sandown, and then there was also the 1992 Sandown 500 that was stopped well short of the 500km distance. |
||
|
18 Nov 2012, 22:58 (Ref:3168158) | #25 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,147
|
Quote:
And from where I'm sitting, there's plenty of room for everything to fit in without this 'issue' being thrown out there. I can't stand Timed Races. Everyone bleats on about strategy this and drive to a fuel number that, and then they cut laps out of the race, making the 500k race, a 496, or the 300k race a 288, effectively throwing all that stuff out the window after making it the key focus of the race til that point. Really can't understand why it becomes an issue at all. |
|||
__________________
.......just waiting for ANTON DePASQUALE to chalk up his first V8SC Championship! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"Just Al" lands full time ride in Atlantics | jjspierx | ChampCar World Series | 7 | 16 Jun 2005 03:37 |
Time to drop the "williams is rubbish" belief. | z2252314 | Formula One | 45 | 27 Jun 2002 08:18 |
Leading from start to finish - when was the last time it happened? | R | ChampCar World Series | 10 | 10 Apr 2001 06:38 |