Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Single Seater Racing > Formula One

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 28 Sep 2009, 09:19 (Ref:2549579)   #201
jab
Veteran
 
jab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Wales
South Wales/Coventry
Posts: 4,742
jab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridjab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridjab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
The Virgin/Manor deal is definitely done - the official filings have been done

They'll probably make it now. I hope Branson will be reasonable and won't pull a MasterCard on them
jab is offline  
Old 29 Sep 2009, 15:52 (Ref:2550620)   #202
Peralta
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Mexico
Guadalajara Jalisco
Posts: 505
Peralta is a back marker
Campos is the other team under doubt as well according to Crash.net
Peralta is offline  
Old 29 Sep 2009, 16:24 (Ref:2550641)   #203
jab
Veteran
 
jab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Wales
South Wales/Coventry
Posts: 4,742
jab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridjab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridjab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peralta View Post
Campos is the other team under doubt as well according to Crash.net
That's only based on what Adrian and Audetto have said themselves, which I don't believe is a clear indication of if they're struggling or not. They've been making noises about them being disadvantaged but I don't believe they'd do this if the project was under serious threat, because it would be a PR own goal

Campos are a professional outfit - they are an existing team more-or-less, with Dallara building the cars, and rumoured sponsorship from at least 2 major Spanish corporations in Telefonica and BBVA. I'd say they've got a pretty decent chance of making it and I'd be very disappointed and surprised if they didn't. I'd put them at least level with Virgin, who are still looking for 80% of their budget as Branson's only putting forward 20%, or so I am told
jab is offline  
Old 29 Sep 2009, 18:30 (Ref:2550717)   #204
Peralta
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Mexico
Guadalajara Jalisco
Posts: 505
Peralta is a back marker
Quote:
Originally Posted by jab View Post
That's only based on what Adrian and Audetto have said themselves, which I don't believe is a clear indication of if they're struggling or not. They've been making noises about them being disadvantaged but I don't believe they'd do this if the project was under serious threat, because it would be a PR own goal

Campos are a professional outfit - they are an existing team more-or-less, with Dallara building the cars, and rumoured sponsorship from at least 2 major Spanish corporations in Telefonica and BBVA. I'd say they've got a pretty decent chance of making it and I'd be very disappointed and surprised if they didn't. I'd put them at least level with Virgin, who are still looking for 80% of their budget as Branson's only putting forward 20%, or so I am told

What are the chances that USF1 line up on the grid come 2010?
Peralta is offline  
Old 29 Sep 2009, 19:09 (Ref:2550735)   #205
jab
Veteran
 
jab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Wales
South Wales/Coventry
Posts: 4,742
jab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridjab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridjab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peralta View Post
What are the chances that USF1 line up on the grid come 2010?
Who knows? They've got an investor behind them but there have hardly been any rumours on sponsorship (YouTube doesn't count because there has been no word of actual YouTube sponsorship - just the co-founder investing). You have to wonder where the money is coming from. There has been talk that their current base is like a ghost town, but then there are others saying they're the most advanced of the new teams

Personally I think it's looking a bit dodgy for them
jab is offline  
Old 1 Oct 2009, 00:44 (Ref:2551606)   #206
Born Racer
Race Official
Veteran
 
Born Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 9,017
Born Racer will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameBorn Racer will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameBorn Racer will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameBorn Racer will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameBorn Racer will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameBorn Racer will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameBorn Racer will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameBorn Racer will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameBorn Racer will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameBorn Racer will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameBorn Racer will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Fame
Are they still called US F1? Wasn't there something like Bernie preventing them using the F1 name?
Born Racer is online now  
Old 1 Oct 2009, 02:11 (Ref:2551625)   #207
ptclaus98
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
United States
Posts: 1,767
ptclaus98 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Officially they're Team USF1.
ptclaus98 is offline  
Old 1 Oct 2009, 05:35 (Ref:2551665)   #208
Peralta
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Mexico
Guadalajara Jalisco
Posts: 505
Peralta is a back marker
What bothers me is that USF1 doesn't dispel the comment that Bernie made which are harmful in attracting sponsors.

Peter Windsor has also said during the Speed tv broadcast back in June that he hopes can keep his job as commentator.

To be fair I know less about Manor than I do about USF1 so who knows
Peralta is offline  
Old 1 Oct 2009, 11:59 (Ref:2551841)   #209
jondownunder
Veteran
 
jondownunder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
United Kingdom
England
Posts: 1,965
jondownunder should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridjondownunder should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Born Racer View Post
Are they still called US F1? Wasn't there something like Bernie preventing them using the F1 name?
Further to ptclaus98's answer, I think they're only allowed to use "F1" in their name if they use the word "Team" as well (such as Force India F1 Team, Renault F1 Team), hence they changed from US F1 (briefly via US GPE/US Grand Prix Engineering?) to Team US F1.
jondownunder is offline  
Old 1 Oct 2009, 12:36 (Ref:2551877)   #210
jab
Veteran
 
jab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Wales
South Wales/Coventry
Posts: 4,742
jab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridjab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridjab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
I think the original name was USF1 but they are now US F1, with the space being quite important for Bernard
jab is offline  
Old 1 Oct 2009, 15:24 (Ref:2551997)   #211
duke_toaster
Veteran
 
duke_toaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
European Union
Englandland
Posts: 5,100
duke_toaster should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridduke_toaster should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
I thought the parent company was called US Grand Prix Engineering and the team will be called USF1, but please don't quote me on that.
duke_toaster is offline  
__________________
Marbot : "Ironically, the main difference between a Red Bull and a Virgin is that Red Bull can make parts of its car smaller and floppier."
Old 1 Oct 2009, 15:49 (Ref:2552006)   #212
kartracer41
Racer
 
kartracer41's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
United States
Michigan, USA
Posts: 338
kartracer41 has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
If I remember correctly, the name was changed from USF1 (space or not), to USGP or whatever because, until they had a spot on the grid, they were not allowed to use the "F1" per Bernie. So once their application was accepted, they were allowed to use the "F1".
kartracer41 is offline  
Old 1 Oct 2009, 17:06 (Ref:2552068)   #213
Peralta
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Mexico
Guadalajara Jalisco
Posts: 505
Peralta is a back marker
Ken Anderson has always said USF1 would be replaced with another name before the start of the season.
Peralta is offline  
Old 1 Oct 2009, 17:26 (Ref:2552090)   #214
duke_toaster
Veteran
 
duke_toaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
European Union
Englandland
Posts: 5,100
duke_toaster should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridduke_toaster should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
In that case perhaps they were expecting someone like Penske or Saleen (yes, I know they no longer exist) to come onboard?
duke_toaster is offline  
__________________
Marbot : "Ironically, the main difference between a Red Bull and a Virgin is that Red Bull can make parts of its car smaller and floppier."
Old 1 Oct 2009, 17:49 (Ref:2552104)   #215
Born Racer
Race Official
Veteran
 
Born Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 9,017
Born Racer will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameBorn Racer will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameBorn Racer will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameBorn Racer will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameBorn Racer will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameBorn Racer will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameBorn Racer will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameBorn Racer will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameBorn Racer will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameBorn Racer will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameBorn Racer will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Fame
By dropping US from the name, they could reduce the emphasis on the American team element. It's a nice idea to run the team from America if they could use the cream of American engineering talent. The principle of American drivers is too restrictive, without a line of potentials competing in something like GP2.
Born Racer is online now  
Old 1 Oct 2009, 18:19 (Ref:2552132)   #216
chunterer
Race Official
Veteran
 
chunterer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location:
Down the end of my road
Posts: 15,742
chunterer is going for a new world record!chunterer is going for a new world record!chunterer is going for a new world record!chunterer is going for a new world record!chunterer is going for a new world record!chunterer is going for a new world record!chunterer is going for a new world record!
Quote:
Originally Posted by duke_toaster View Post
In that case perhaps they were expecting someone like Penske or Saleen (yes, I know they no longer exist) to come onboard?
Or Andretti Green.
chunterer is offline  
__________________
"Double Kidney Guv'nah?"
"No thanks George they're still wavin a white flag!"
Old 1 Oct 2009, 19:04 (Ref:2552177)   #217
courageous
Veteran
 
courageous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
United Kingdom
Chatham, Kent
Posts: 1,527
courageous should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridcourageous should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
yeah, because his past F1 forray was a huge success lol ;-)
courageous is offline  
__________________
There's an old F1 adage, 'If you want to finish first, first you have to be a duplicitous little moaning git'
Old 1 Oct 2009, 19:04 (Ref:2552178)   #218
kartracer41
Racer
 
kartracer41's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
United States
Michigan, USA
Posts: 338
kartracer41 has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
Quote:
Originally Posted by chunterer View Post
Or Andretti Green.
Well they are currently restructuring operations...
kartracer41 is offline  
Old 2 Oct 2009, 23:46 (Ref:2552988)   #219
Peralta
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Mexico
Guadalajara Jalisco
Posts: 505
Peralta is a back marker
It seems the reason for doubt about USF1 making the grid is because they missed a technical meeting with Cosworth and the reason being is that they are now chasing William's Toyota engines. Toyota would make sense for an American team since they are the biggest sellers more so than Ford.

For a team that was boasting about having fans getting closer access to the team and not even having a website is cause for concern however.

Embarrasing
Peralta is offline  
Old 3 Oct 2009, 05:27 (Ref:2553037)   #220
jab
Veteran
 
jab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Wales
South Wales/Coventry
Posts: 4,742
jab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridjab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridjab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Well, they've now hired the former head of Cosworth's motorsport operations, Bernard Ferguson - link
jab is offline  
Old 3 Oct 2009, 17:03 (Ref:2553347)   #221
ptclaus98
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
United States
Posts: 1,767
ptclaus98 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by chunterer View Post
Or Andretti Green.
ptclaus98 is offline  
Old 3 Oct 2009, 17:11 (Ref:2553356)   #222
Jamesy-18
Veteran
 
Jamesy-18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
United Kingdom
Derbyshire
Posts: 1,136
Jamesy-18 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Here's my predictions as to who will make it. Campos and Lotus will, Manor will just about make it but USF1 won't. Their spot will be taken by Qadbak Sauber.
Jamesy-18 is offline  
__________________
A touring car and sportscar forum poster. The F1 sub forum is terrible! :P
Old 4 Oct 2009, 01:34 (Ref:2553527)   #223
Leighton Irwin
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Canada
Victoria Harbour (on Georgian Bay)
Posts: 737
Leighton Irwin should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid

From the beginning I have had seious doubts about USF1 or whatever it is called this week.
They apparently do have a shop, a former NAPCAR facility. From what I have been able to ascertain it is a bare shop, with probably work benches.
As far as I know there is no machinery. A very basic race shop requires drill presses, grinders, compressers, lathes, welding equipment, mills, shears, painting booths, cleaning tanks and a myramid of other equipment. Air and electrics have to be run. Even if it all arrives tomorrow it is going to take weeks to install and get running. Much of it will have to be tied into the computers, assuming they have them up and running. All will have to be tested to see if they work properly.
Then we get into production of the myriamid of carbon fibre parts. Molds have to be made. Sometimes a male and then from that a female or vice versa. That can take weeks.
You have to have the enclaves to produce the various carbon fibre parts.
Many different parts cannot be put in one enclave at the same time due to structural demands. Even layup of one part can take weeks. One brake caliper, if you are not buying one, or your own disc can take 6 weeks to manufacture. 3 or 4 sets (note sets) of dics can be used per weekend per car.
No matter how carefully the design team, assuming they really have one, draws the hundreds (thousands?) of parts there are going to be things that just won't mesh.
To me USF1 is mostly smoke and mirrors.
Leighton Irwin is offline  
__________________
I am really just like a little kitten.
Just a baby Puma!
Old 5 Oct 2009, 11:50 (Ref:2554457)   #224
csirl
Subscriber
Racer
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location:
Western Hemisphere
Posts: 425
csirl should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leighton Irwin View Post
From the beginning I have had seious doubts about USF1 or whatever it is called this week.
They apparently do have a shop, a former NAPCAR facility. From what I have been able to ascertain it is a bare shop, with probably work benches.
As far as I know there is no machinery. A very basic race shop requires drill presses, grinders, compressers, lathes, welding equipment, mills, shears, painting booths, cleaning tanks and a myramid of other equipment. Air and electrics have to be run. Even if it all arrives tomorrow it is going to take weeks to install and get running. Much of it will have to be tied into the computers, assuming they have them up and running. All will have to be tested to see if they work properly.
Then we get into production of the myriamid of carbon fibre parts. Molds have to be made. Sometimes a male and then from that a female or vice versa. That can take weeks.
You have to have the enclaves to produce the various carbon fibre parts.
Many different parts cannot be put in one enclave at the same time due to structural demands. Even layup of one part can take weeks. One brake caliper, if you are not buying one, or your own disc can take 6 weeks to manufacture. 3 or 4 sets (note sets) of dics can be used per weekend per car.
No matter how carefully the design team, assuming they really have one, draws the hundreds (thousands?) of parts there are going to be things that just won't mesh.
To me USF1 is mostly smoke and mirrors.
I was under the impression that they were subcontracting the manufacturing of all the parts to existing companies in the area? All they were doing in house was designing the car.
csirl is offline  
Old 5 Oct 2009, 18:20 (Ref:2554643)   #225
kartracer41
Racer
 
kartracer41's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
United States
Michigan, USA
Posts: 338
kartracer41 has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leighton Irwin View Post
From the beginning I have had seious doubts about USF1 or whatever it is called this week.
They apparently do have a shop, a former NAPCAR facility. From what I have been able to ascertain it is a bare shop, with probably work benches.
As far as I know there is no machinery. A very basic race shop requires drill presses, grinders, compressers, lathes, welding equipment, mills, shears, painting booths, cleaning tanks and a myramid of other equipment. Air and electrics have to be run. Even if it all arrives tomorrow it is going to take weeks to install and get running. Much of it will have to be tied into the computers, assuming they have them up and running. All will have to be tested to see if they work properly.
Then we get into production of the myriamid of carbon fibre parts. Molds have to be made. Sometimes a male and then from that a female or vice versa. That can take weeks.
You have to have the enclaves to produce the various carbon fibre parts.
Many different parts cannot be put in one enclave at the same time due to structural demands. Even layup of one part can take weeks. One brake caliper, if you are not buying one, or your own disc can take 6 weeks to manufacture. 3 or 4 sets (note sets) of dics can be used per weekend per car.
No matter how carefully the design team, assuming they really have one, draws the hundreds (thousands?) of parts there are going to be things that just won't mesh.
To me USF1 is mostly smoke and mirrors.
I read a press release quite awhile back that they had the machinery installed. I don't understand why this could be "smoke in mirrors". Why would anyone just nab a F1 grid spot, then for no reason, just not even attempt to be on the grid come time? Just like everyone likes to say about other scandals, I don't see the motive to blow a bunch of smoke and make a fake F1 team that isn't going to happen.
kartracer41 is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Valencia F1 Grand Prix asdf Formula One 1 8 Mar 2008 00:01
Which F1 Grand Prix should I go to see in 2008? ahmurray Trackside 34 24 Feb 2008 20:52
F1 Grand Prix Masters Dutton National & International Single Seaters 128 30 Oct 2005 21:37
F1 Grand Prix for the PSP Down F0rce Virtual Racers 21 19 Sep 2005 10:41
The silence is deafening!!!!!!! z2252314 Formula One 50 26 Jun 2002 04:59


All times are GMT. The time now is 22:37.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.