|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
2 Apr 2000, 17:46 (Ref:10825) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 1,101
|
Well finally we're off to something.
Mosley asked the teams to simplify their electronic systems aboard the cars for more transparency for the scrutineers. First steps must already be made at Imola. What do you think is possible and realistic here? Do you think electronic 'easter-eggs' like traction control will be eliminated by these kinds of measurements? Do you favor or oppose a ban on advanced electronics? How do you think this will affect the gaps between the teams or drivers; i.e. will McLaren and Ferrari be as much in front as they are now? Do you think the current ratio car\driver of 80\20 responsible for the package performance can be reverted to an ideal situation of 50\50 by any means? Regards, Dino IV |
||
|
2 Apr 2000, 18:07 (Ref:10826) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 1,512
|
Good question Dino.
I read somewhere this week that one team's tech director has said that it would be worse than reverting to carburettors. I'm not sure it will be that bad, but there will be changes. Engines will not be able to limit rpm during wheelspin by sensing torque differential. (traction control by proxy). Therefore the emphasis will be on the driver to control the revs on standing starts and low speed corners. This will also have an effect on engine reliability. As I understand it, there will be a limit on the number of engine sensors to (I think) four. This is likely to eliminate the airbox sensor that detirmines fueling under extreme situations. (extended pitstops and delayed starts) There will also be limits on the amount and type of telemetry. This is likely to include automatic engine RPM limiting - drivers will have to be aware of pit-lane speeds once again. The main thing is, this will only affect those that are cheating. Anyone who complains probably has plenty to lose. This will have the effect of promoting less well-funded teams, as the not so powerful engines (such as the supertec and older Sauber-Petronas Ferrari engines) will close the gap with the current electronic tech wizards. |
||
|
6 Apr 2000, 23:05 (Ref:10827) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 5,867
|
If you visit www.reuters.com/news you will find something very interesting:
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Trebuchet MS, Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR> Motor racing-Formula 1 team cheated last season - Mosley<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> Please read it, it is really interesting. I couldn't find it anywhere else on net, don't know why. Could be the cause of this sudden urge of banning advanced electronics? Do you know some more details about this? |
||
|
10 Apr 2000, 12:58 (Ref:10828) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 1,101
|
Well it's all over the net now, Red
Yeah it's true. Traction control has never left the scene really. It's a bit annoying that Mosley didn't name the team when he wanted to bring this one out. Last rumours are that either McLaren or Williams brought some illegal engine-mapping of Ferrari to FIA's attention but Mosley will reveal the team's identity soon I guess. What do you all make of the questions in my original post? Cheers, Dino IV |
||
|
10 Apr 2000, 14:35 (Ref:10829) | #5 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 235
|
I guess it would be a reasonable thing for engineers to protect their engine by preventing it from free acceleration faster than a preset value.
This surely would mean that this value could be set low enough that it was just above the feasible acceleration of the tyre/transmission/engine combination when the tyres have grip. Therefore a natural traction control device created out of the engineers initial desire to protect the engine. This area isn't the great problem, th eNo.1 problem is aero downforce. F1 should run at 100mm (4") clearanc elike the rest of us. ;-)) IanC |
||
|
13 Apr 2000, 12:11 (Ref:10830) | #6 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 8
|
What I found interesting is Mosley's choice of words. He said he did believe "it did not change the outcome of the WC." There is lots of room for interpretation.
What championship is he talking about, driver or constructor. Why did it not influence the championship? Were Ferrari and McLaren _not_ using TC? I just read that Bernie is upset with Max and wants to have names. We'll see. |
|
|
16 Apr 2000, 23:16 (Ref:10831) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 1,101
|
Hi Marco,
Mosley was as much a Sphinx as he wanted to be I guess. It could be anybody until the team's identity is revealed. Even Ferrari or McLaren. Maybe it's about a race one of those didn't score any points by DNF or finishing outside top 6 like Albert Park in the case of McLaren or Nurburgring in the case of Ferrari. Truth is outthere |
||
|
18 Apr 2000, 14:46 (Ref:10832) | #8 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 246
|
Personally, I think they should ban sequential gearboxes. Be even more input from the drivers then
|
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Advanced driver courses | Icycool | Road Car Forum | 8 | 9 Oct 2004 01:46 |
Advanced Driving Course | AndyF | Road Car Forum | 2 | 24 May 2003 12:56 |
Electronics-are they really that bad? | Inigo Montoya | Formula One | 55 | 4 Apr 2003 13:19 |
How advanced is F1 over production cars? | kmchow | Formula One | 24 | 28 Aug 2002 10:35 |
Electronics ban in F1 | twomey | Formula One | 21 | 12 Oct 2000 16:31 |