|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
8 Mar 2019, 17:13 (Ref:3889194) | #576 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,181
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-T580 using Tapatalk |
||
|
8 Mar 2019, 17:23 (Ref:3889197) | #577 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 819
|
Its this very erratic performance that leads me to believe the fundamental engineering ability is within the building.It needs somebody to remove the barriers or attitudes that obstruct the creation of a competitive car. They have to acknowledge that there is a need to function as a team searching for performance. It is possible in their position to erect barriers between departments and for the occupants of each to believe that their part is doing OK and the fault lies elsewhere. Its normally the whole car that scores points, or doesn't, regardless of any belief in one particular part or system.
|
|
|
9 Mar 2019, 13:13 (Ref:3889314) | #578 | |
Veteran
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,211
|
Is the presumption that Lowe voluntarily walked or was fired?
|
|
|
9 Mar 2019, 13:21 (Ref:3889315) | #579 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,181
|
Currently he is on 'leave of absence' so technically has neither walked or been fired. Should he not return, then I suspect it might be a blend of the two by 'mutual consent' or whatever the current term is.
One for the lawyers and cheque book to resolve I expect. Sent from my SM-T580 using Tapatalk |
|
|
9 Mar 2019, 18:28 (Ref:3889345) | #580 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 18,418
|
Will Lowe want to come back? I guess we’ll see how he feels during his leave of abscence
|
|
__________________
He who dares wins! He who hesitates is lost! |
9 Mar 2019, 20:14 (Ref:3889356) | #581 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,469
|
|||
|
9 Mar 2019, 21:28 (Ref:3889364) | #582 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,320
|
Lowe has a stake in that team and it's hard to disentangle that. Lowe may also have some personal issue there that may have caused this and maybe they'll bring him back if that is resolved if that is the case. I don't think either Claire or Jonathan are up to the standard to turn around this team tbh. Claire has had a few years now.
I like each of their drivers as drivers but together as their line up? It's a tricky line up to have full confidence in. Neither are competition-warm at F1 level. It'd be great if they could turn around all this pre-season anarchy and turn in a good result in Australia. What a story that would be. |
||
__________________
If I had asked my customer what they wanted, they would've said a faster horse. -Henry Ford |
9 Mar 2019, 21:49 (Ref:3889370) | #583 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,307
|
||
|
10 Mar 2019, 00:17 (Ref:3889388) | #584 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 18,418
|
Well Williams are in a bit of a mess despite everything and nobody is sure which way it is going
|
|
__________________
He who dares wins! He who hesitates is lost! |
10 Mar 2019, 05:09 (Ref:3889404) | #585 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 8,088
|
the illegal parts on the Williams described by Craig Scarborough.
https://www.grandprix247.com/2019/03...sed-by-scarbs/ Seems like there is quite a lot of advanced thinking going on, it is dubious whether the parts are illegal, and should designers not be pushing the boundaries of design? Was this run past Charlie Whiting for legality before installation during the off season? |
|
|
10 Mar 2019, 18:56 (Ref:3889497) | #586 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 18,418
|
Well I’m sure they are not illegal, just not done very well
However it’s bad enough if your car is slow without being illegal too! I’m sure they haven’t done that though But anything they are unsure of, they’ll talk over with Charlie |
|
__________________
He who dares wins! He who hesitates is lost! |
10 Mar 2019, 21:41 (Ref:3889556) | #587 | |||
Race Official
1% Club
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 46,736
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Happy David Thexton Day, 21st March 2003 “I am not uncertain” - Dollar Bill Stern, Billions “Fear stimulates my imagination” - Don Draper, Mad Men “Everybody Lies” - Dr Gregory House, House “Trust But Verify” - Commissioner Frank Reagan, Blue Bloods |
11 Mar 2019, 00:39 (Ref:3889566) | #588 | ||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,270
|
|||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
11 Mar 2019, 02:31 (Ref:3889573) | #589 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,882
|
I think it's easy to be critical of Williams regarding the potential for parts being deemed not within the rules. They didn't plan to show up late for testing or to be the slowest. So they should be working on creative solutions. Pushing the envelope in the grey areas is how innovation happens in F1. Especially when it comes to aero.
However, showing up late, being slow and then trying ideas that may be disallowed... A nightmare start to the season so far. The most positive thing I can say is... It always could be worse. Someday, someone is going to write a book about this. Especially if the drama continues. I just hate that it is going to likely be years from now as to when the true story of what is going on at Williams comes out. Right now it is mostly speculation along with a list of bodies on the ground and poor performance on track. And that story starts a good bit prior to the current Lowe departure. I think his departure is just a result of whatever cancer exists within that team. As much as everyone wants to jump on Claire (I have mostly given her the benefit of doubt until very recently), it's probably less about her than it is her inability to address whatever is going on. As to "cancer", it may not be her, but she may just be playing the role of the doctor that fails to cure it. Lowe may have been a failed treatment, or the wrong treatment for whatever problem exists. Time for a new doctor. I think it was maybe in this thread, or maybe the 2019 predictions thread in which someone said that Williams needs to NOT have a family member running the F1 team. I think that would be a VERY smart idea. It reminds me of what Porsche did in the 1970's. They basically restructured in a way that prevented Porsche/Piech family members from running the business. They could still pull levers at a very high level, but were not involved in day to day operations. This is probably what Williams needs right now for the F1 operation and maybe the entire Williams Group. Richard |
|
__________________
To paraphrase Mark Twain... "I'm sorry I wrote such a long post; I didn't have time to write a short one." |
11 Mar 2019, 04:38 (Ref:3889578) | #590 | ||
Race Official
1% Club
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 46,736
|
What is Mr Head doing these days?
|
||
__________________
Happy David Thexton Day, 21st March 2003 “I am not uncertain” - Dollar Bill Stern, Billions “Fear stimulates my imagination” - Don Draper, Mad Men “Everybody Lies” - Dr Gregory House, House “Trust But Verify” - Commissioner Frank Reagan, Blue Bloods |
11 Mar 2019, 05:28 (Ref:3889580) | #591 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 6,108
|
I think you mean Sir Patrick Head, as he is now officially known.
When he resigned his post as Director of Engineering in 2011, continuing as a Board Director of Williams Hybrid Engineering, but that finished when Williams sold the company a few years ago. AFAIK there is no longer any connection with Williams these days. I know when Patrick retired from F1 he said he was looking forward to enjoying time with his family, and he is now must be mid 70's, so not about to want to get back into mainstream F1 involvement. He certainly doesnt need the money, having cashed in his shareholding in Williams at the right time with enough for his and family's future needs. He occasionally appears at FIA events these days and is I believe against electric power / hybridisation of F1, claiming that FE with its manufacturer involvement should be covering that aspect and is the focus of the manufacturers. He spoke at an FIA Sport event just over a year or so ago talking about the future and past of F1 and his thoughts. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_HSTriFsTSI |
||
|
11 Mar 2019, 06:25 (Ref:3889582) | #592 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 8,088
|
I would be far more relaxed about the future of F1 if Liberty Media had employed Sir Patrick to sort out the future rules of F1 instead of Mr Brawn.
|
|
|
11 Mar 2019, 11:07 (Ref:3889616) | #593 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 18,418
|
Well they've not got the right people in place. Head though is probably enjoying his retirement, but I don't know what Ross Brawn is doing with regards to F1
|
|
__________________
He who dares wins! He who hesitates is lost! |
11 Mar 2019, 12:35 (Ref:3889632) | #594 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,181
|
Quote:
t'was I ! To expand on this, a family member comes with too much baggage - they will understandably be consumed by protecting the Williams legacy and continually proving to SFW that they are up to the job, the name over the door aspect is almost too much of a burden to carry in the front line of the team. You can still do all of the above from the comfort of the board room instead of the pit lane. Williams F1 of old (or GP engineering if you like) was Frank, who lived and breathed it 24/7 with the sort of energy and dedication that few people have and to the detriment of other aspects of his life as highlighted in the recent Williams documentary. Neither Clare or JW are Frank - JW does posses the same detailed knowledge of Williams, he can reel off precise histories of their cars and races, but that doesn't make you a great team principal. I read Peter Windsor's piece and arguably he is taking about how you could run an F1 team 20 years ago, so despite his insight I don't know how relevant it is. Arguably a senior director at say Tesco who is responsible for operating 1,000 stores with 50,000 lines in each that need to be stocked and open 24/7 could bring much to an F1 team, they don't need to know how to build an F1 car, but they know about resourcing, managing people and crucial deadlines. If I was on Williams board I would look outside F1, it is too cliquey and they will only bring with them ideas and working practices that you may not be able to implement anyway, so I would go for a clean sheet of paper. |
||
|
11 Mar 2019, 13:06 (Ref:3889640) | #595 | |
Racer
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 270
|
All things decay and die, Williams has just reached it's natural ending.
|
|
|
11 Mar 2019, 13:54 (Ref:3889655) | #596 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,469
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
11 Mar 2019, 15:40 (Ref:3889675) | #597 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,060
|
Quote:
Claire probably just isn't ruthless enough or all consumed in what's needed to run an F1 team. She's probably a bit too nice for an F1 leading role in the same way as Dominicalli and Whitmarsh were and same as Claire, both of those guys are undoubtedly highly skilled. It's not easy. Just look at the odd balls who ran F1 teams over the years. Probably a bit late now though. Williams F1 will end up being sold off before it crumbles into the dust. Some rich Middle Eastern investors when there are no more football teams worth buying. |
||
__________________
All the same, isn't there a grand oul stretch in the evenings... |
11 Mar 2019, 16:04 (Ref:3889680) | #598 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,882
|
Quote:
For Porsche they had people like Butzi Porsche and Ferdinand Piëch battling for power (among others of that generation). The change in structure pushed them to be successful elsewhere and to not be in direct competition. Ferdinand moved into Audi and Butzi created his Porsche design firm that exists to this day. Not to say there is not internal power struggles within the Porsche family, but it was more controlled. Plus the holdings of the Porsche/Piëch family dwarfs that of the Williams family. Regardless, in an attempt to "keep it in the family", Williams allowed the sibling rift to play out. Richard |
||
__________________
To paraphrase Mark Twain... "I'm sorry I wrote such a long post; I didn't have time to write a short one." |
11 Mar 2019, 16:13 (Ref:3889681) | #599 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,181
|
Quote:
Add to which at the level that Williams are, F1 is increasingly a year at a time results based business. If you don't get the results it affects your FOM cash, in the case of 2018 you lose two paying 'customers' because the product you have delivered is not good enough, which in turns affects your appeal to other 'paying customers' and sponsors and impacts on your budget to build the next product. All of the above affects the value of the business and impact on shareholders, etc Three bad years could in a row can have a severe impact. |
||
|
11 Mar 2019, 16:27 (Ref:3889684) | #600 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,656
|
I suppose that this is a hurdle that a lot of 'family businesses' have to cross at some point, a difficult one in any situation, but probably made more difficult when the business also uses the family name. I suppose SFW (and others in a similar situation) have to accept that Williams Grand Prix Engineering can still be called that (and even still be that), even if the person at the helm has a different surname.
Not trying to trivialise things, but I suppose that if the company was called Didcot Grand Prix Engineering they may not have felt able to move the HQ to Grove... |
||
__________________
Incognito: An Italian phrase meaning Nice Gearchange! |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I have a little plan - Help needed | ECW Dan Selby | My Track Designs | 2 | 21 Apr 2011 15:32 |
BMW? are they loosing the performance advantage they once had? | Nismo | Formula One | 38 | 3 Jun 2005 10:22 |
Could have, Should have, Would have: Dennis on MS | 11tenths | Formula One | 13 | 21 Feb 2005 13:14 |
They don't make drivers like they used to... | TimD | Motorsport History | 1 | 29 Mar 2001 06:35 |
They're Boxy, But They're Good. | TimD | Road Car Forum | 10 | 5 Nov 2000 13:42 |