|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
6 Jul 2007, 14:45 (Ref:1956259) | #11 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 972
|
yup for the second one there was nothing about downforce for sure. but in the first case, it might have been...i mean, yeah, he pushed too hard for the conditions, but with higher downforce, it might not have been too hard...just maybe. and like i said, one of the drivers said the 2007 r10 is a bit harder to control in a low fuel situation, which isn't quite normal and which they aren't really accustomed to...it sounded like a bit of a delicate complaint about the car's handling basically.
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[LM24] 1997 Le Mans trap speeds? | Splatz the Cow | 24 Heures du Mans | 5 | 31 May 2004 08:27 |
[LM24] 1998 Le Mans trap speeds? | MulsanneMike | 24 Heures du Mans | 5 | 23 May 2004 21:05 |
[LM24] Le Mans trap speeds needed | MulsanneMike | 24 Heures du Mans | 25 | 23 Sep 2003 16:39 |
Le Mans trap speeds needed | MulsanneMike | Motorsport History | 4 | 17 Sep 2003 23:39 |
[LM24] Le Mans Trap Speeds for 2003? | Tim Northcutt | 24 Heures du Mans | 15 | 9 Jul 2003 03:42 |