|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
View Poll Results: Pick an engine, any engine | |||
Current: 2.65L turbocharged methanol-fed purebred V8s (800hp, $$) | 9 | 33.33% | |
Turbocharged gasoline 4-cylinders (WRC, about 500hp $) | 1 | 3.70% | |
Turbocharged stock-block V6 engines, about 800hp ($) | 3 | 11.11% | |
4.0L V8s, IRL $$ | 1 | 3.70% | |
3.0L V10s, Formula 1 ($$$$$) | 5 | 18.52% | |
Multiple formulas (800hp, old USAC-style, see below) | 4 | 14.81% | |
Other? | 4 | 14.81% | |
Voters: 27. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
21 Dec 2002, 18:07 (Ref:454981) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,936
|
2005 engine poll
Everyone who makes a choice in the poll had better sign on to the final proposal, even if their choice doesn't win.
The "multiple engines" choice is the one I've talked about, allowing the current 2.65L turbo V8s, along with turbocharged 3.5L stock-block V6s, and naturally aspirated 6.0L pushrod V8s to all compete, with performance equalized through different boost levels. Poll will remain up for 3 weeks. Last edited by Lee Janotta; 21 Dec 2002 at 18:13. |
||
__________________
"Put a ****ing wheel on there! Let me go out again!" -Gilles Villeneuve, Zandvoort, 1979 |
21 Dec 2002, 18:18 (Ref:454984) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,936
|
The "multiple" choice, BTW, counts as half a vote for the current engines and half a vote for the V6s... If we don't end up with a clear consensus out of this, I'll probably hold a runoff, or the proposal might suggest a couple ideas.
Feel free to share your reasons for voting one way or another! Last edited by Lee Janotta; 21 Dec 2002 at 18:23. |
||
__________________
"Put a ****ing wheel on there! Let me go out again!" -Gilles Villeneuve, Zandvoort, 1979 |
21 Dec 2002, 23:46 (Ref:455126) | #3 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 226
|
well if you run multiple engines it might turn out like world superbikes where one type of engine out performs the other. Just a thought
|
||
__________________
cheers |
21 Dec 2002, 23:52 (Ref:455131) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,744
|
The forthcomming 1.4L rotary, peripheral ported and turbocharged with minimum 800hp!
I like the current formula with a tad more power, anything similar is good too. Doing the ~3.0L V6 thing allows manufacturers to claim their race engines are the same as their production engines. |
||
__________________
No Rotor, No Motor. |
22 Dec 2002, 01:36 (Ref:455190) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,294
|
I like the current engine formula as it is unique to international motorsport.
V10 normally-aspirated F1 engines can bugger off. They sound terrible and belong in F1 only. Plus they will cost a fortune, something which CART can ill-afford. |
||
__________________
Sunderland Til I Die! |
22 Dec 2002, 02:54 (Ref:455227) | #6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,071
|
I like the current formulae. It's what Champcar racing is all about isn't it. And...it HAS to be a turbo. It can't be anything else.
|
||
__________________
Don't let manufacturers ruin F1. RIP Tyrrell, Arrows, Prost, Minardi, Jordan. |
22 Dec 2002, 03:29 (Ref:455240) | #7 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 148
|
I went with "other".
I like the turbos and the ability to control the hp figures from one year to the next by simply adjusting boost. No need for occasional expensive displacement changes ala IRL and F1. I'd opt for a 1.5 liter turbocharged V12. |
||
__________________
"Well, what would you do with a brain if you had one?" Dorothy to the Scarecrow |
22 Dec 2002, 08:38 (Ref:455325) | #8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 972
|
What is a stock block V6 in this poll? - Alfa Romeo, Mazda, Toyota etc make some quite nice alloy block, 24 valve DOHC (per cylinder bank) V6 engines - that would be good, but if it means stone age push rod V6's I don't see the point.
|
||
|
22 Dec 2002, 13:35 (Ref:455474) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 13,000
|
I like the idea of a split formula, similar to 1980s F1. Indeed it was the one I suggested many months ago, as a way of utilising both sets of equipment. I think the current F1 engines only sound terirble because of the traction control, I can't wait to hear Ford turbos roar again.
|
||
|
22 Dec 2002, 15:20 (Ref:455520) | #10 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,936
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
"Put a ****ing wheel on there! Let me go out again!" -Gilles Villeneuve, Zandvoort, 1979 |
22 Dec 2002, 16:07 (Ref:455546) | #11 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 10,241
|
I quite like the idea of multiple engine choices.
Would b like in sportscars, where there is no fixed type of engine, and teams can experiment with the different engines to find the best solution. |
||
|
22 Dec 2002, 16:20 (Ref:455559) | #12 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,125
|
I just foresee the multiple-engine formula as being difficult to equalize. And traction control would become increasingly hard to police.
If it were up to me, I'd keep the status quo. But in today's economic climate, perhaps that's not the most feasible way to go. The major engine manufacturers across the globe may find that the V6 is more appealling to their corporate goals. At any rate, I certainly vote that we keep the turbos. That's what makes a ChampCar a ChampCar! |
||
__________________
Don't make a fuss, just get on the bus! |
23 Dec 2002, 05:36 (Ref:455955) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 972
|
O.k. so that's modern alloy block overhead cam V6's.... thanks for the clarification Lee.
Nothing wrong with the current Turbo-V8 engines, nothing at all..... except there's only one supplier. If a stock block V6 based formula can help that, it's a good thing, but you'd want that manufacturer commitment first, before you changed engines. While I like the idea of multi-format, equalisation is always going to be a problem. Never liked V10's..... if you can't build a proper V12 the way god intended..... you might as well stick with V6's and V8's Last edited by alfasud; 23 Dec 2002 at 05:38. |
||
|
25 Dec 2002, 23:53 (Ref:457404) | #14 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,366
|
Personally Id go with the F1 V10s myself.
Last edited by SALEEN S7R; 25 Dec 2002 at 23:54. |
||
__________________
Sportscar Racing fans of the world Unite! |
26 Dec 2002, 03:20 (Ref:457453) | #15 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 229
|
I would go for a combo of #1 and #3.SO for me it is other.
|
||
__________________
Hail to the Redskins Hail Victory Let's go Terrapins Chariots with 4 horses,hehe,try 700 The forums head dirtbag and headhog |
26 Dec 2002, 03:48 (Ref:457456) | #16 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 18
|
Tom Anderson suggests turbo I-4s running on gas.
They would make around the same power, and be cheaper, as well as attracting more manufacturers. I want to see Formula 1 turbo engine regs from the early 80s myself. That would be sweet! |
||
__________________
" Nigel Mansell, Ayrton Senna, Alain Prost, Emiliano Zapata, Bob Wollek, Adrian Reynard, Bruce McLaren, Soichiro Honda, Dan Gurney, Pancho Villa, Max Cavalera, Jamey Jasta, and Che Guevara" These people are my inspiration. |
28 Dec 2002, 22:08 (Ref:459143) | #17 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 71
|
i think current engines, maybe at 2.5 liters w/ maximum boost of 3 bar and maxmimum 15,000 rpm, cart supplying the ecu for no tc. stock derived 3.0 v6's would be interesting but i dont know if you would want some cars running methanol and others gas.
|
||
|
29 Dec 2002, 01:35 (Ref:459304) | #18 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,125
|
Somebody should'a bought ya a new "shift" button for Christmas!
You're right when suggesting that the fuels must be standard. |
||
__________________
Don't make a fuss, just get on the bus! |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Poll 2005 BSB Champion? | SALEEN S7R | Bike Racing | 6 | 28 Jan 2005 20:16 |
2005 aero regs poll | Lee Janotta | ChampCar World Series | 10 | 28 Dec 2002 22:02 |
2005 Chassis regs poll | Lee Janotta | ChampCar World Series | 13 | 26 Dec 2002 03:51 |
Jaguar gets new engine. Jordan gets old engine! | Adam43 | Formula One | 13 | 29 Sep 2002 16:50 |
CART Announces 2003 - 2005 Engine Rules | SevenGrain | ChampCar World Series | 13 | 12 Oct 2001 00:53 |