Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Barn Finds > ChampCar World Series

View Poll Results: Pick an engine, any engine
Current: 2.65L turbocharged methanol-fed purebred V8s (800hp, $$) 9 33.33%
Turbocharged gasoline 4-cylinders (WRC, about 500hp $) 1 3.70%
Turbocharged stock-block V6 engines, about 800hp ($) 3 11.11%
4.0L V8s, IRL $$ 1 3.70%
3.0L V10s, Formula 1 ($$$$$) 5 18.52%
Multiple formulas (800hp, old USAC-style, see below) 4 14.81%
Other? 4 14.81%
Voters: 27. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 21 Dec 2002, 18:07 (Ref:454981)   #1
Lee Janotta
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location:
Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Posts: 4,936
Lee Janotta should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
2005 engine poll

Everyone who makes a choice in the poll had better sign on to the final proposal, even if their choice doesn't win.

The "multiple engines" choice is the one I've talked about, allowing the current 2.65L turbo V8s, along with turbocharged 3.5L stock-block V6s, and naturally aspirated 6.0L pushrod V8s to all compete, with performance equalized through different boost levels.

Poll will remain up for 3 weeks.

Last edited by Lee Janotta; 21 Dec 2002 at 18:13.
Lee Janotta is offline  
__________________
"Put a ****ing wheel on there! Let me go out again!"
-Gilles Villeneuve, Zandvoort, 1979
Old 21 Dec 2002, 18:18 (Ref:454984)   #2
Lee Janotta
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location:
Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Posts: 4,936
Lee Janotta should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
The "multiple" choice, BTW, counts as half a vote for the current engines and half a vote for the V6s... If we don't end up with a clear consensus out of this, I'll probably hold a runoff, or the proposal might suggest a couple ideas.

Feel free to share your reasons for voting one way or another!

Last edited by Lee Janotta; 21 Dec 2002 at 18:23.
Lee Janotta is offline  
__________________
"Put a ****ing wheel on there! Let me go out again!"
-Gilles Villeneuve, Zandvoort, 1979
Old 21 Dec 2002, 23:46 (Ref:455126)   #3
wreckless
Racer
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location:
Sydney, oz
Posts: 226
wreckless should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
well if you run multiple engines it might turn out like world superbikes where one type of engine out performs the other. Just a thought
wreckless is offline  
__________________
cheers
Old 21 Dec 2002, 23:52 (Ref:455131)   #4
Snrub
Veteran
 
Snrub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Canada
London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,744
Snrub should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridSnrub should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
The forthcomming 1.4L rotary, peripheral ported and turbocharged with minimum 800hp!

I like the current formula with a tad more power, anything similar is good too. Doing the ~3.0L V6 thing allows manufacturers to claim their race engines are the same as their production engines.
Snrub is offline  
__________________
No Rotor, No Motor.
Old 22 Dec 2002, 01:36 (Ref:455190)   #5
f1manoz
Veteran
 
f1manoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Australia
Lincolnshire, UK
Posts: 7,294
f1manoz should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridf1manoz should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridf1manoz should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
I like the current engine formula as it is unique to international motorsport.

V10 normally-aspirated F1 engines can bugger off. They sound terrible and belong in F1 only. Plus they will cost a fortune, something which CART can ill-afford.
f1manoz is offline  
__________________
Sunderland Til I Die!
Old 22 Dec 2002, 02:54 (Ref:455227)   #6
DNQ
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Australia
Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 4,071
DNQ should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I like the current formulae. It's what Champcar racing is all about isn't it. And...it HAS to be a turbo. It can't be anything else.
DNQ is offline  
__________________
Don't let manufacturers ruin F1. RIP Tyrrell, Arrows, Prost, Minardi, Jordan.
Old 22 Dec 2002, 03:29 (Ref:455240)   #7
Arneal
Racer
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location:
New Mexico, USA
Posts: 148
Arneal should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I went with "other".

I like the turbos and the ability to control the hp figures from one year to the next by simply adjusting boost. No need for occasional expensive displacement changes ala IRL and F1.

I'd opt for a 1.5 liter turbocharged V12.
Arneal is offline  
__________________
"Well, what would you do with a brain if you had one?"
Dorothy to the Scarecrow
Old 22 Dec 2002, 08:38 (Ref:455325)   #8
alfasud
Veteran
 
alfasud's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
New Zealand
Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 972
alfasud should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
What is a stock block V6 in this poll? - Alfa Romeo, Mazda, Toyota etc make some quite nice alloy block, 24 valve DOHC (per cylinder bank) V6 engines - that would be good, but if it means stone age push rod V6's I don't see the point.
alfasud is offline  
Old 22 Dec 2002, 13:35 (Ref:455474)   #9
BootsOntheSide
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
England
Eastbourne, England
Posts: 13,000
BootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
I like the idea of a split formula, similar to 1980s F1. Indeed it was the one I suggested many months ago, as a way of utilising both sets of equipment. I think the current F1 engines only sound terirble because of the traction control, I can't wait to hear Ford turbos roar again.
BootsOntheSide is offline  
Old 22 Dec 2002, 15:20 (Ref:455520)   #10
Lee Janotta
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location:
Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Posts: 4,936
Lee Janotta should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by alfasud
What is a stock block V6 in this poll? - Alfa Romeo, Mazda, Toyota etc make some quite nice alloy block, 24 valve DOHC (per cylinder bank) V6 engines - that would be good, but if it means stone age push rod V6's I don't see the point.
No, no pushrod V6s... I'm talking 3.0L or 3.5L, cast alloy block, dual overhead cams, 4 or 5 valves per cylinder.
Lee Janotta is offline  
__________________
"Put a ****ing wheel on there! Let me go out again!"
-Gilles Villeneuve, Zandvoort, 1979
Old 22 Dec 2002, 16:07 (Ref:455546)   #11
pirenzo
Veteran
 
pirenzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
United Kingdom
London, UK
Posts: 10,241
pirenzo should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridpirenzo should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridpirenzo should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
I quite like the idea of multiple engine choices.
Would b like in sportscars, where there is no fixed type of engine, and teams can experiment with the different engines to find the best solution.
pirenzo is offline  
Old 22 Dec 2002, 16:20 (Ref:455559)   #12
macdaddy
Veteran
 
macdaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Canada
St.Catharines Ontario
Posts: 8,125
macdaddy has a real shot at the podium!macdaddy has a real shot at the podium!macdaddy has a real shot at the podium!macdaddy has a real shot at the podium!
I just foresee the multiple-engine formula as being difficult to equalize. And traction control would become increasingly hard to police.

If it were up to me, I'd keep the status quo. But in today's economic climate, perhaps that's not the most feasible way to go. The major engine manufacturers across the globe may find that the V6 is more appealling to their corporate goals.

At any rate, I certainly vote that we keep the turbos. That's what makes a ChampCar a ChampCar!
macdaddy is offline  
__________________
Don't make a fuss, just get on the bus!
Old 23 Dec 2002, 05:36 (Ref:455955)   #13
alfasud
Veteran
 
alfasud's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
New Zealand
Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 972
alfasud should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
O.k. so that's modern alloy block overhead cam V6's.... thanks for the clarification Lee.

Nothing wrong with the current Turbo-V8 engines, nothing at all..... except there's only one supplier. If a stock block V6 based formula can help that, it's a good thing, but you'd want that manufacturer commitment first, before you changed engines. While I like the idea of multi-format, equalisation is always going to be a problem.

Never liked V10's..... if you can't build a proper V12 the way god intended..... you might as well stick with V6's and V8's

Last edited by alfasud; 23 Dec 2002 at 05:38.
alfasud is offline  
Old 25 Dec 2002, 23:53 (Ref:457404)   #14
SALEEN S7R
Veteran
 
SALEEN S7R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
England
Poole, England
Posts: 7,366
SALEEN S7R should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridSALEEN S7R should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridSALEEN S7R should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Personally Id go with the F1 V10s myself.

Last edited by SALEEN S7R; 25 Dec 2002 at 23:54.
SALEEN S7R is offline  
__________________
Sportscar Racing fans of the world Unite!
Old 26 Dec 2002, 03:20 (Ref:457453)   #15
jslone
Racer
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
United States
Gaithersburg Maryland
Posts: 229
jslone should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I would go for a combo of #1 and #3.SO for me it is other.
jslone is offline  
__________________
Hail to the Redskins Hail Victory
Let's go Terrapins
Chariots with 4 horses,hehe,try 700
The forums head dirtbag and headhog
Old 26 Dec 2002, 03:48 (Ref:457456)   #16
Hsaavedra
Rookie
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location:
Irving,TX
Posts: 18
Hsaavedra should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Tom Anderson suggests turbo I-4s running on gas.
They would make around the same power, and be cheaper, as well as attracting more manufacturers. I want to see Formula 1 turbo engine regs from the early 80s myself. That would be sweet!
Hsaavedra is offline  
__________________
" Nigel Mansell, Ayrton Senna, Alain Prost, Emiliano Zapata, Bob Wollek, Adrian Reynard, Bruce McLaren, Soichiro Honda, Dan Gurney, Pancho Villa, Max Cavalera, Jamey Jasta, and Che Guevara"
These people are my inspiration.
Old 28 Dec 2002, 22:08 (Ref:459143)   #17
The Other Chris
Rookie
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location:
united states
Posts: 71
The Other Chris should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
i think current engines, maybe at 2.5 liters w/ maximum boost of 3 bar and maxmimum 15,000 rpm, cart supplying the ecu for no tc. stock derived 3.0 v6's would be interesting but i dont know if you would want some cars running methanol and others gas.
The Other Chris is offline  
Old 29 Dec 2002, 01:35 (Ref:459304)   #18
macdaddy
Veteran
 
macdaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Canada
St.Catharines Ontario
Posts: 8,125
macdaddy has a real shot at the podium!macdaddy has a real shot at the podium!macdaddy has a real shot at the podium!macdaddy has a real shot at the podium!
Somebody should'a bought ya a new "shift" button for Christmas!
You're right when suggesting that the fuels must be standard.
macdaddy is offline  
__________________
Don't make a fuss, just get on the bus!
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Poll 2005 BSB Champion? SALEEN S7R Bike Racing 6 28 Jan 2005 20:16
2005 aero regs poll Lee Janotta ChampCar World Series 10 28 Dec 2002 22:02
2005 Chassis regs poll Lee Janotta ChampCar World Series 13 26 Dec 2002 03:51
Jaguar gets new engine. Jordan gets old engine! Adam43 Formula One 13 29 Sep 2002 16:50
CART Announces 2003 - 2005 Engine Rules SevenGrain ChampCar World Series 13 12 Oct 2001 00:53


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:35.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.