Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Saloon & Sportscar Racing > Australasian Touring Cars.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 1 Sep 2020, 11:05 (Ref:3999399)   #351
2 litre Touring Car Star
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Australia
Posts: 506
2 litre Touring Car Star User had had their licence endorsed2 litre Touring Car Star User had had their licence endorsed
Quote:
Originally Posted by V8 Fireworks View Post
Running the race cars with a brand on the side is a profit making exercise, whereas developing a race car is a loss-making exercise.

If a number of teams are only interested in running cars and not developing them (e.g., Team 18, Team Sydney, Matt Stone Racing), why force them into a technical arms which they have no interest in?
Nobody's forcing them. but car racing is an arms race.

Quote:
Originally Posted by V8 Fireworks View Post

So what does it matter if Gen 3 cars are actually identical!?

Does even one single fan care that GRM use Kevlar wheel arches when Kelly Racing use carbon-fibre wheel arches? Nobody cares about the minute differences that are still allowed, it makes no difference to anybody.
Possibly not the fans, but GRM and Kellys do.

Quote:
Originally Posted by V8 Fireworks View Post
For example, the Supashock control shock or Alcon control brakes have come in... It's not like we've seen fans throwing away their Sachs or Brembo flags away in disgust at their favourite brand of shock or brake caliper being outlawed!
Car racing is outlet for the automotive industry. When it isn't that then it's lame.
2 litre Touring Car Star is offline  
Old 2 Sep 2020, 01:31 (Ref:3999540)   #352
tobyobi
Rookie
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 84
tobyobi should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
It appears Supercars are starting to request tenders for Gen3 equipment:

https://www.speedcafe.com/2020/09/01...ol-components/

The interesting part that Speedcafe skipped over would be that Gen3 will be going drive by wire throttle:

Code:
3. Technical Requirements
a. Pedal box specifics:
vii. GEN3 will use fly by wire throttle
There are also references to "control front and rear suspension", but unclear whether that is just the new Pedders SupaShock control units, or an entire control corner design.
tobyobi is offline  
Old 4 Sep 2020, 10:57 (Ref:4000021)   #353
ford71
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Australia
Adelaide
Posts: 1,146
ford71 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridford71 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Pretty sure Speedcafe had a separate article for the Drive by Wire decision.
As they are wont to do
ford71 is offline  
__________________
.......just waiting for ANTON DePASQUALE to chalk up his first V8SC Championship!
Old 4 Sep 2020, 18:51 (Ref:4000104)   #354
V8 Fireworks
Veteran
 
V8 Fireworks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,938
V8 Fireworks should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridV8 Fireworks should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridV8 Fireworks should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
I wonder why they are (potentially) changing the brakes and the wheels? Particularly the wheels which seem fine, unless it is just a formality and the current design and supplier is likely to be re-confirmed.
V8 Fireworks is offline  
Old 4 Sep 2020, 23:18 (Ref:4000139)   #355
tobyobi
Rookie
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 84
tobyobi should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by V8 Fireworks View Post
I wonder why they are (potentially) changing the brakes and the wheels? Particularly the wheels which seem fine, unless it is just a formality and the current design and supplier is likely to be re-confirmed.
Could be the opportunity to see what other suppliers may offer, and also ensure that the incumbent supplier isn’t price gouging.
tobyobi is offline  
Old 5 Sep 2020, 15:07 (Ref:4000265)   #356
one five five
Veteran
 
one five five's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,269
one five five should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridone five five should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by tobyobi View Post
Could be the opportunity to see what other suppliers may offer, and also ensure that the incumbent supplier isn’t price gouging.
Imagine a world where the teams themselves could see what other suppliers may offer and choose accordingly, the one price gouging may lose out...or the teams may find its worth the money.
one five five is offline  
Old 6 Sep 2020, 07:15 (Ref:4000355)   #357
Gaz170
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Australia
Gold Coast, QLD
Posts: 1,506
Gaz170 should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridGaz170 should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridGaz170 should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Personally I liked when everyone could choose their own wheels, made the cars look a bit more interesting.

Reading between the lines, WAU have BMW interested (4 or 6 series?).

Camaro could be a go, not sure who would fund it though, maybe 888 using a similar deal they have with the current Commodore.

DJRTP & Tickford would likely stick with Mustangs, maybe Kelly's as well unless a great deal is offered elsewhere.

Kia Stinger is still a wildcard, but will take a lot of money - who's going to fund that?
Gaz170 is offline  
__________________
What if there were no hypothetical questions?
Old 6 Sep 2020, 07:32 (Ref:4000358)   #358
Matt K
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,012
Matt K should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridMatt K should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaz170 View Post
Personally I liked when everyone could choose their own wheels, made the cars look a bit more interesting.

Reading between the lines, WAU have BMW interested (4 or 6 series?).

Camaro could be a go, not sure who would fund it though, maybe 888 using a similar deal they have with the current Commodore.

DJRTP & Tickford would likely stick with Mustangs, maybe Kelly's as well unless a great deal is offered elsewhere.

Kia Stinger is still a wildcard, but will take a lot of money - who's going to fund that?
WAU and BMW deal fell apart due to Covid so now BMW in Gen 3.
Matt K is offline  
Old 6 Sep 2020, 13:12 (Ref:4000418)   #359
Sandgroper
Veteran
 
Sandgroper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Australia
Perth WA (south of the river)
Posts: 2,536
Sandgroper should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaz170 View Post

DJRTPwould likely stick with Mustangs, maybe Kelly's as well unless a great deal is offered elsewhere.
I can see PENSKE, packing up with Scotty and going home.
No Holden = no series worth worrying about
Sandgroper is offline  
__________________
GO Hard or GO Home
Old 11 Sep 2020, 04:18 (Ref:4001598)   #360
Mixer
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location:
Surry Hills, NSW
Posts: 6,618
Mixer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridMixer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridMixer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridMixer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandgroper View Post
I can see PENSKE, packing up with Scotty and going home.
No Holden = no series worth worrying about
Roger has bagged a bunch of wins and put a skidmark on Scotty's Bathurst win, so he'll pull up stumps, leaving Dr Ryan Story behind...
Mixer is offline  
Old 17 Sep 2020, 06:11 (Ref:4002919)   #361
djr81
Racer
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 324
djr81 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Speedcafe as the fuel capacity of gen 3 up to 130 litres from 111. Probably only adds another four laps to a Bathurst stint but it all helps.
djr81 is offline  
Old 18 Sep 2020, 04:28 (Ref:4003352)   #362
Sandgroper
Veteran
 
Sandgroper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Australia
Perth WA (south of the river)
Posts: 2,536
Sandgroper should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
He's at it already.

https://www.motorsport.com/v8superca...arity/4876544/

I do understand clarity needed, but he is always so vocal.
Sandgroper is offline  
__________________
GO Hard or GO Home
Old 18 Sep 2020, 13:01 (Ref:4003504)   #363
Casper
Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,211
Casper should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridCasper should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandgroper View Post
He's at it already.

https://www.motorsport.com/v8superca...arity/4876544/

I do understand clarity needed, but he is always so vocal.
With some good reasons it would seem. I have to agree with him that the series management have been asleep at the wheel and if they don't wake up soon there will be a big crash.
Casper is offline  
Old 18 Sep 2020, 13:04 (Ref:4003505)   #364
Sandgroper
Veteran
 
Sandgroper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Australia
Perth WA (south of the river)
Posts: 2,536
Sandgroper should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Casper View Post
With some good reasons it would seem. I have to agree with him that the series management have been asleep at the wheel and if they don't wake up soon there will be a big crash.
Oh I agree, its a large investment which you need clarity but he always seems to be in the media and vocal, maybe good free advertising
Sandgroper is offline  
__________________
GO Hard or GO Home
Old 24 Sep 2020, 03:32 (Ref:4005963)   #365
2 litre Touring Car Star
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Australia
Posts: 506
2 litre Touring Car Star User had had their licence endorsed2 litre Touring Car Star User had had their licence endorsed
Unfortunately for me, I've been accused of double standards. It's an incorrect accusation, but it's not for me to call out the accuser and diminish them.

It has however enabled me to make points I've made in other threads, but make them in this thread and keep on to the topic. So her it goes.

It’ll be interesting to see what concoction Gen 3 turns out to be.

Fans can dream up any car they like. But motor racing economics still applies regardless of opinion. It’s not a questions of whether you like it, that doesn’t matter. It’s a question of what your opinion is in spite of it.

You can get a think tank consisting of Adrian Newey, Gordon Murray, John Barnard and Frank Dernie involved, but motor racing economics is still motor racing economics.

I’ll give you a frame work picking the two most prominent engine configurations, and you can fill in the gaps with other types of car and engine configurations.

5 litre V8 - $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

2 litre 4cyl - $$$$$$$$$$$$$$


5 litre V8 producing 2 litre 4 cyl performance - $$$$$$$$$$$

2lt 4 cyl producing 5lt V8 performance - $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$


Car doing low 2min at Bathurst - $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $

Car doing low 2:10 at Bathurst - $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Car doing low 2:20 at Bathurst - $$$$$$$$$$$


Converted road going to a racing car - $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Specialist racing car - $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $$$$$


“Safe” car - $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Not so safe car -$$$$$$$$$$$$$


Value of spec/type cars for the front runners - $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Value of spec/type cars for the midfield/tailenders - $$$$$$$$$$$


More races - $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Less races - $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$


This is not even my opinion. It’s just how car racing works.

Supercars has exhausted every outlet possible to maintain an ideology. Time has come for a significant compromise. What’s it going to be?

Personally, I would just have “managed” a 2 litre cars, cut the red tape and open up the possibilities for competitors.

But that won’t satisfy the supercars community and their fans. They strictly adhere to a motor racing ideology with absolutely no compromises or regard for anything else (except the authenticity of the cars). So we’ll see what happens.
2 litre Touring Car Star is offline  
Old 24 Sep 2020, 03:49 (Ref:4005965)   #366
2 litre Touring Car Star
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Australia
Posts: 506
2 litre Touring Car Star User had had their licence endorsed2 litre Touring Car Star User had had their licence endorsed
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandgroper View Post
He's at it already.

https://www.motorsport.com/v8superca...arity/4876544/

I do understand clarity needed, but he is always so vocal.
Woah woah woah! I did not read this trash! Hang on a second.

Peter Adderton is exactly the type of numpty you don't want involved motorsport. But affirms my point that supercars fans are not interested in car racing. The following quotes...

Quote:
"Consumers have become less passionate about the brand of their car," he said.
Well, that's actually a problem for car racing.

Quote:
"I think people love the concept of racing.
Have I not said something like this???

Quote:
If you look at fans right now, a lot of the people who follow MotoGP, at the end of the day they don't ride Ducatis or Yamahas. That's the way I see it."
The problem for supercars is that Motogp is the real deal. The bikes are authentic. Supercars are not. (Plus, people do ride Yamahas. )

Adderton. Just an attempt to be a dumber, less scary, home brand version of Flavio Briatore.
2 litre Touring Car Star is offline  
Old 24 Sep 2020, 04:17 (Ref:4005970)   #367
chavez
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Australia
The Basin, Victoria
Posts: 2,836
chavez should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridchavez should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridchavez should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2 litre Touring Car Star View Post
Woah woah woah! I did not read this trash! Hang on a second.

Peter Adderton is exactly the type of numpty you don't want involved motorsport. But affirms my point that supercars fans are not interested in car racing. The following quotes...

Well, that's actually a problem for car racing.


Have I not said something like this???

The problem for supercars is that Motogp is the real deal. The bikes are authentic. Supercars are not. (Plus, people do ride Yamahas. )

Adderton. Just an attempt to be a dumber, less scary, home brand version of Flavio Briatore.
A motogp bike has as much in common with a road bike as an F1 car does with a road car.
chavez is offline  
__________________
"Your biggest auto race may one day become a Camaro playground", Chris Economaki, Bathurst 1979
Old 24 Sep 2020, 04:30 (Ref:4005974)   #368
2 litre Touring Car Star
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Australia
Posts: 506
2 litre Touring Car Star User had had their licence endorsed2 litre Touring Car Star User had had their licence endorsed
You are correct. The bikes are from the manufacturer, and that it what makes it genuine.
2 litre Touring Car Star is offline  
Old 1 Oct 2020, 02:49 (Ref:4007727)   #369
V8 Fireworks
Veteran
 
V8 Fireworks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,938
V8 Fireworks should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridV8 Fireworks should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridV8 Fireworks should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2 litre Touring Car Star View Post
You are correct. The bikes are from the manufacturer, and that it what makes it genuine.
That's true. You can cheer on the Yamaha, Honda, KTM, Aprilia, Suzuki or Ducati in the knowledge it was engineered by same company who engineered your own road-going bike. There's always WSBK or ASBK is you are interested in more production-based stuff, either way be it prototypes or production-based, there is a huge variety of manufacturers on the grid.

Whereas, Supercars is limited to just Holden and Ford, one of which doesn't exist more, much to the detriment of people who are enthusiasts of other car manufacturers be it Subaru, Toyota, Mitsubishi, Renault, Volkswagen, Audi, BMW, Alfa Romeo, FIAT etc...

Most disappointingly Nissan and BMW were heavily involved in the ATCC, yet were not involved in the drafting of regulations for '93, which is just outrageous given the sensible broad-based 2000cc rules popular in England at the time ('92) which accommodated all manufacturers and provided great touring car racing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cEfiwyiV8hs

Even if not the British rules then say, a 2000cc turbo & 5000cc NA equivalence formula could have been the ticket for Australia, with 2L I6 Skylines and 2L I4 Cosworth Sierras racing 5L V8 Commodores, Falcons and 5L V12 8 Series?

Last edited by V8 Fireworks; 1 Oct 2020 at 03:08.
V8 Fireworks is offline  
Old 1 Oct 2020, 03:01 (Ref:4007729)   #370
V8 Fireworks
Veteran
 
V8 Fireworks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,938
V8 Fireworks should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridV8 Fireworks should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridV8 Fireworks should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Casper View Post
I have to agree with him that the series management have been asleep at the wheel and if they don't wake up soon there will be a big crash.
It is quite concerning that Supercars do not appear to have sufficiently tactful plans in place to reattract important makes like BMW and Alfa Romeo...


V8 Fireworks is offline  
Old 1 Oct 2020, 11:59 (Ref:4007774)   #371
Casper
Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,211
Casper should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridCasper should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
While it is a V8 powered silhouette series none of the big European makers will look at it. Open the series up to use the OEM motors and it might work but to do that goes against the philosophy of the series. The fact that the philosphy use by date has expired is yet to register on the fans and the promoters. The series has had a good run but sooner or later reality will set in and things will change.
Casper is offline  
Old 4 Oct 2020, 02:44 (Ref:4008427)   #372
2 litre Touring Car Star
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Australia
Posts: 506
2 litre Touring Car Star User had had their licence endorsed2 litre Touring Car Star User had had their licence endorsed
Quote:
Originally Posted by V8 Fireworks View Post
That's true. You can cheer on the Yamaha, Honda, KTM, Aprilia, Suzuki or Ducati in the knowledge it was engineered by same company who engineered your own road-going bike. There's always WSBK or ASBK is you are interested in more production-based stuff, either way be it prototypes or production-based, there is a huge variety of manufacturers on the grid.
Yeah. But other fans don't get that. They think how they're entertained is more important than the authenticity of the cars.

Quote:
Originally Posted by V8 Fireworks View Post
Whereas, Supercars is limited to just Holden and Ford, one of which doesn't exist more, much to the detriment of people who are enthusiasts of other car manufacturers be it Subaru, Toyota, Mitsubishi, Renault, Volkswagen, Audi, BMW, Alfa Romeo, FIAT etc...
Yeah, that's another thing supercar fans don't get. They think racing is a pantomime.

Quote:
Originally Posted by V8 Fireworks View Post
Most disappointingly Nissan and BMW were heavily involved in the ATCC, yet were not involved in the drafting of regulations for '93, which is just outrageous given the sensible broad-based 2000cc rules popular in England at the time ('92) which accommodated all manufacturers and provided great touring car racing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cEfiwyiV8hs

Even if not the British rules then say, a 2000cc turbo & 5000cc NA equivalence formula could have been the ticket for Australia, with 2L I6 Skylines and 2L I4 Cosworth Sierras racing 5L V8 Commodores, Falcons and 5L V12 8 Series?
Tbh, Nissan stank. The GTR was taking the mickey and I agree they shouldn't have been considered.

Australia is not a motoring/racing hub, and was a bit behind the times. But that's not necessarily a bad thing.

As an outright class, the 2ltr car were not the right class for the ATCC at the time. The Ford/Holden class was fair enough. But eventually that should morphed into a class Toyota and Mitsubishi would like to compete in. The later down the road, a super touring type class.

With the inferiority complex in Australian motor racing. There's no way a 2 litre class would be allowed to compete equally with 5ltr cars. It would've confused plebs.

Super Touring - Good enough for Nigel Mansell, but not good enough for Dick Johnson.
2 litre Touring Car Star is offline  
Old 4 Oct 2020, 02:59 (Ref:4008430)   #373
tobyobi
Rookie
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 84
tobyobi should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2 litre Touring Car Star View Post
Super Touring - Good enough for Nigel Mansell, but not good enough for Dick Johnson.
Class II Touring Cars ("Super Touring") and Group 3A Touring Cars both started in 1993.

One of these two formulas managed to not shoot itself in the foot with spiralling manufacturer induced costs by the start of the new millennium.

I would agree Supercars aren't in a great spot right now, but Super Touring was dead 20 years ago. History would suggest they've backed the right horse so far.
tobyobi is offline  
Old 4 Oct 2020, 03:10 (Ref:4008431)   #374
2 litre Touring Car Star
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Australia
Posts: 506
2 litre Touring Car Star User had had their licence endorsed2 litre Touring Car Star User had had their licence endorsed
Quote:
Originally Posted by tobyobi View Post
Class II Touring Cars ("Super Touring") and Group 3A Touring Cars both started in 1993.
Not really. But I get the point.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tobyobi View Post
One of these two formulas managed to not shoot itself in the foot with spiralling manufacturer induced costs by the start of the new millennium.
It's got nothing to do with shooting itself in the foot. Super Touring got too big to handle. It was also an extension of Group A.


Quote:
Originally Posted by tobyobi View Post
I would agree Supercars aren't in a great spot right now, but Super Touring was dead 20 years ago. History would suggest they've backed the right horse so far.
Not just they're not in a great spot, they've been stale for almost the whole time. In the absence of anything else, they're just accepted as being "best" or "better".

Super Touring may be dead, but 2 litre cars have carried on.
2 litre Touring Car Star is offline  
Old 4 Oct 2020, 04:04 (Ref:4008447)   #375
Casper
Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,211
Casper should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridCasper should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2 litre Touring Car Star View Post
Yeah. But other fans don't get that. They think how they're entertained is more important than the authenticity of the cars.
Professional motor racing is only there for one reason and that is entertainment. SC, BTCC, NASCAR etc are designed to make money for the promoter and participants and then entertain but above all to make money and that does not happen without fans being entertained.
Casper is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LMDh (DPi regulations version 2.0) NaBUru38 North American Racing 422 25 Jan 2023 09:34
New F1 Team - Panthers seeking to join grid for 2022 karting Formula One 29 31 Aug 2019 21:57
[WEC] Audi to Return in 2022? rdjones ACO Regulated Series 21 28 Sep 2018 20:23
Gen IV B/Mark IRL Indycar Series 14 22 Jul 2003 04:33


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:11.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.