|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
1 Nov 2008, 11:16 (Ref:2325316) | #1 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 104
|
Renault wing - strange behaviour?
I have just had the following link pointed out to me by a friend. It is very short and you need to watch a few times to see it but the Renault rear wing definitely seems to behave in a strange way. Are rear wings allowed to move like that?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OlC-7L8L2TE I think it was filmed in Fuji. |
||
|
1 Nov 2008, 11:25 (Ref:2325318) | #2 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,714
|
It looks like it was responding to the shock of the chicane-hopping, not to aerodynamic input.
Wings are allowed to move however they want as long as they pass scrutineering |
|
|
1 Nov 2008, 11:45 (Ref:2325327) | #3 | |||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 42,974
|
Quote:
It was an odd motion. I suppose that you wouldn't notice the flexing as easily if it was caused by aerodynamic load. To do that you'd have to compare the wing at low speed and high speed. I wonder if you'd see the same movement? I'm sure it passed scrutineering. he he. We had a suggestion that Renaults recent engine changes (for reliability) had added many horses, but coul dit be a slippy wing? |
|||
__________________
Seriously not taking motorsport too seriously. |
1 Nov 2008, 12:24 (Ref:2325338) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,246
|
Well it appears to be acting from an upward force, not downward, which the FIA dont test for so it could be some grey area theyre exploiting or it simply could be reacting from the chicane.
|
||
|
1 Nov 2008, 12:40 (Ref:2325344) | #5 | |
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
Renault are using ducts in the rear bodywork to heat the tyres,maybe they're using it to heat something else as well.
|
|
|
1 Nov 2008, 14:12 (Ref:2325379) | #6 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,060
|
It's nothing - it's just the whole movement of suspension, shock etc of hitting the kerbs.
Alss, the flexi wings only really worked on straights where they lowered to decrease drag. The above movement was mid corner consistent with any shock movement of kerb hopping. |
|
__________________
All the same, isn't there a grand oul stretch in the evenings... |
2 Nov 2008, 09:36 (Ref:2325731) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,211
|
Not exactly sure what i'm meant to be looking at tbh.
|
||
__________________
That's so frickin uncool man! |
3 Nov 2008, 22:39 (Ref:2327429) | #8 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 473
|
Looks to me like the entire plane with "RENAULT" on it moves seperately from the rest of the body of the wing, and it appears damped by the way it moves, but what the hey, looks like they've got away with it if it is an "Interpretation" of the rule book.
|
||
__________________
"I didn't even know girls gave signs. They could have had an illuminated badge that said 'Free Sex Right Now, Just Ask!' and I'd have said 'Wow, where'd you get that badge?'" Perry McCarthy |
4 Nov 2008, 02:03 (Ref:2327535) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,707
|
i dont see any problem, any structure will deform under load and especially the kind of loading while the car is running over rumble strips.
And if it is deliberate then they've made a massive cock up as the compression of the upper filament is only for a fraction of a second in a part of the track where he would require more downforce. No problem here. |
||
__________________
"If there's anything more important than my ego around, I want it caught and shot now" Douglas Adams. 1952-2001 |
4 Nov 2008, 02:42 (Ref:2327544) | #10 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,508
|
Quote:
Peter Windsor was asked about it and he said that the footage was causing great waves throughout the paddock. I expected to hear more on this but so far all is silent. |
|||
__________________
Bigamy is having one wife too many. Monogamy is the same. {Oscar Wilde} |
4 Nov 2008, 03:39 (Ref:2327554) | #11 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 11,402
|
Rather like the Ferrari rear wing then of some time ago...
|
||
|
4 Nov 2008, 05:31 (Ref:2327584) | #12 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,540
|
I saw the same footage as bestfit, can't find it on youtube however. It seemed to me that the footage was very low quality, so a slight movement of the whole wing might have been exaggerated, possibly some flex of the mount with increasing load, and also there was some movement of the top wing element, again it appeared to me to be only due to the loading.
|
||
|
4 Nov 2008, 09:06 (Ref:2327680) | #13 | |
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
There'll be loads of videos on you-tube next season,showing worrying amounts of front wing movement.
|
|
|
5 Nov 2008, 10:08 (Ref:2328536) | #14 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,707
|
Quote:
the Rear wing 'squatting' reduces the slot gap between the upper and lower rear wing filament reducing the downforce and drag created so obviously you want this effect on a long straight for maximum benefit. However, considering that on long straights the rear wing is under its maximum load (with drag and downforce squaring with speed) then some compression of the structure is unavoidable. |
|||
__________________
"If there's anything more important than my ego around, I want it caught and shot now" Douglas Adams. 1952-2001 |
5 Nov 2008, 19:34 (Ref:2328931) | #15 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 758
|
The wing flexes when the car rides the kerb. IMO I don't see anything that suggests sinister areo tweaks. Also camera angle may exaggerate what shake there is.
Cheers Peter |
||
__________________
Madness is a normal condition interupted only by spells of sanity. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Renault front wing | KNMwt15000 | Formula One | 3 | 3 Apr 2006 12:02 |
Radical new wing on Renault! pics-> | Sodemo | Formula One | 46 | 1 Jun 2003 15:31 |