|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
23 Jun 2020, 12:44 (Ref:3983385) | #76 | ||
The Honourable Mallett
20KPINAL
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 37,573
|
And we still think the current, or even the budget capped F1 model, is sustainable?
|
||
|
23 Jun 2020, 13:36 (Ref:3983398) | #77 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 9,951
|
With the 2020 cars to be used in 2021 and possibly again in 2022 i would say there is no reason to question its sustainability/viability for next season at least.
After covid and the ensuing economic recovery who knows...but at least they have reset the bar to some extent. Of course if they never race again... |
||
__________________
Home, is where I want to be but I guess I'm already there I come home, she lifted up her wings guess that this must be the place |
23 Jun 2020, 13:49 (Ref:3983399) | #78 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 6,399
|
It seems McLaren have been successful in getting their court action fastracked given their July 17th deadline previously mentioned.
This article in Autosport today puts a bit of light on the process and why /wherefores. https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/15...nancing-battle |
||
|
23 Jun 2020, 13:50 (Ref:3983400) | #79 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 18,692
|
Hope this works. This seems their best option to keep the team afloat until someone with money comes in
|
|
__________________
He who dares wins! He who hesitates is lost! |
23 Jun 2020, 14:01 (Ref:3983404) | #80 | |
Veteran
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,211
|
||
|
23 Jun 2020, 15:30 (Ref:3983425) | #81 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,107
|
Quote:
As to McLaren being poorly run. My perception is that they have been on the rebound? I also think F1 teams have been running on the razors edge for a long time (even when well run). The history over the past decade or so confirms that. Teams coming and going, bankruptcy, corrupt investors/owners, frequent changing of ownership and branding, etc. The crash and burn aspect has just been working it's way from the bottom up (weakest first). Short lived ventures like USF1, Virgin/Marussia/Manor, then mid-aged survivor like Jordan/Midland/Spyker/Force India/Racing Point and is now hitting established icons like Williams and McLaren. I am just waiting on Haas to pull out next. I expect Haas is in a wait and see regarding 2020 and maybe 2021 results. Then pulling the plug if not trending in the right direction. We have talked for years about how it is unsustainable in current form. They couldn't have seen into the future, but in hindsight, if they had only initiated reforms earlier, then a significant kick to the system such as the Covid19 pandemic may not have hurt so much. Richard |
||
__________________
To paraphrase Mark Twain... "I'm sorry I wrote such a long post; I didn't have time to write a short one." |
23 Jun 2020, 15:49 (Ref:3983428) | #82 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 5,887
|
Richard, re your post above, one has to take into account prior reports that appeared to suggest that McLaren's financial woes are centred around their supercar operation, not their F1 operations. Sales were depressed even before the virus appeared, and they had/have issues surrounding the residual values of older, used cars plus other concerns.
|
||
|
23 Jun 2020, 17:29 (Ref:3983445) | #83 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,107
|
Quote:
For example if they are looking to generate short term cash, they are selling off some parts of their heritage collection (which I assume is predominantly on the racing side). Then there is the facilities. Google says that is pretty much the McLaren Technology Centre with that consisting of two (?) buildings. One is the HQ (and I assume core for the racing side) plus another for car production. But I see mention that the car production building contains racing related items (wind tunnel?) Which facilities are being sold. The car side, or both? It sounds like there is no easy way to unlink the production car financial issues from the rest. Or at least McLaren Group is not looking to cut the car production side loose to remove impact to the other parts. So is there really any significant distinction between the problems of the rest of the business and the racing side if proposed solutions for one impact the other? I don't revel in any of this. Over the years I have cheered for both Williams and McLaren. So I am sad to see both having these problems. Richard |
||
__________________
To paraphrase Mark Twain... "I'm sorry I wrote such a long post; I didn't have time to write a short one." |
23 Jun 2020, 19:03 (Ref:3983454) | #84 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 9,951
|
Quote:
if Adam Parr's graphic novel was to be believed, SFW cut the legs out from under his attempts to unify the smaller team in pushing for a more equal financial distribution. Ron Denis came back and ousted Whitmarsh who was himself trying to unify the teams to strengthen their bargaining position but ultimately saw those efforts fail as well. it seems to me they had their chances to initiate reform but ultimately on an ownership/organizational level, they chose the other path. for sure i love these teams also and have sympathy for them but live by the sword, die by the sword. |
|||
__________________
Home, is where I want to be but I guess I'm already there I come home, she lifted up her wings guess that this must be the place |
23 Jun 2020, 20:40 (Ref:3983461) | #85 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,107
|
Quote:
So you will have big teams playing the game of large companies/corporate entities. Creating their presentations and spreadsheets that show a bright and shiny future, but its all just a mess that make little sense other than it is fun to go racing (I do love racing!) The quest to build "flying cars" it another. It's an imminently stupid idea but yet there is always someone tilting at that windmill, but their heart tells them to ignore their brain. This will sound like I am savaging motorsports, but note, I am really commenting on those who try to make it as a "business". Or maybe more specifically those who try to grow the size way beyond what is sustainable. They tend to do this willfully and ignoring the alarm bells (like I say it's a lifestyle, maybe an addiction) Richard PS: I wasn't aware of the Adam Parr book. It sounds interesting, but the physical copy is $86 on Amazon. Is it worth it (I don't care for e-books). |
||
__________________
To paraphrase Mark Twain... "I'm sorry I wrote such a long post; I didn't have time to write a short one." |
23 Jun 2020, 23:01 (Ref:3983473) | #86 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,431
|
This could be really serious. If they can’t use their assets to secure debt, they might be screwed. Not sure why they think the lienor would relinquish effective title.
|
|
|
24 Jun 2020, 07:10 (Ref:3983495) | #87 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,611
|
Quote:
I’m not buying McLarens claims that is all due to Covid. The automotive side of the company has been in trouble even before Covid hit and Covid has just accelerated the effects of this. If McLaren want to avoid being like Aston Martin then they need to change their business in the automotive sector. They make too many cars for their dealers to sell for one example. They make some fantastic cars but the business side is letting that down. |
|||
__________________
Somebody asked if the McLaren F1 was going to be like the Ferrari F40, Gordon Murray replied, "I don't think so, there's no one at McLaren who can weld that badly." |
24 Jun 2020, 07:16 (Ref:3983497) | #88 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 5,887
|
Quote:
The holders of the notes have already agreed to do so, but only if McLaren agrees to their financing terms. And McLaren's argument is that they are able to refinance elsewhere on far better terms which would be beneficial to the group. |
|||
|
24 Jun 2020, 15:26 (Ref:3983613) | #89 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 9,951
|
Quote:
actually that pretty much sums up the book nicely...saved yourself $86 there! |
|||
__________________
Home, is where I want to be but I guess I'm already there I come home, she lifted up her wings guess that this must be the place |
24 Jun 2020, 17:20 (Ref:3983640) | #90 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,213
|
McLaren are set for more borrowing to keep them in business whilst they arrange more borrowing/investment...
https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/15...-national-bank The McLaren Group looks set to arrange a loan from the National Bank of Bahrain (NBB) as it seeks the finances to address an urgent cash shortfall. The move would allow the company to obtain at least the first stage of the required refinancing from a "friendly" organisation that shares a significant part of its ownership with McLaren itself. The NBB is 44% owned by the Mumtalakat Holding Company, Bahrain's sovereign wealth fund, which also owns 56% of McLaren. A loan between the two parties would be on more favourable terms than those available on the financial markets. Court documents have indicated that McLaren is seeking £280m, and that new funding is required by mid-July as the impact of the COVID-19 crisis hits the company hard. I can't see any of this ending well, paying all of this back is surely reliant on a rapid turnaround in the performance of the road car and F1 team businesses? |
|
|
25 Jun 2020, 03:14 (Ref:3983702) | #91 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,211
|
Quote:
ED: is this the book beng referred to https://www.amazon.com.au/Total-Comp...3054974&sr=8-1 |
||
|
25 Jun 2020, 06:52 (Ref:3983718) | #92 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 18,692
|
I've seen an extract of it, it's seems quite a insightful read and a bit tongue in cheek too
|
|
__________________
He who dares wins! He who hesitates is lost! |
25 Jun 2020, 09:29 (Ref:3983735) | #93 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,431
|
||
|
25 Jun 2020, 09:53 (Ref:3983736) | #94 | |
Veteran
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,211
|
||
|
25 Jun 2020, 10:25 (Ref:3983745) | #95 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,431
|
MTC?
Road car model expansion? MTC? Paddock motor home? MTC? Ditching manufacturer deal and funding without alternative funding source? MTC? Repeatedly claiming theirs is the best chassis when everyone else knew it was one of the worst? MTC? Spending money like there is no tomorrow? |
|
|
25 Jun 2020, 10:31 (Ref:3983746) | #96 | |
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 1998
Posts: 16,760
|
in fairness they’ve been using that motorhome for a solid amount of time in f1 terms now.
aside from the mtc (not sure if you mentioned that ) the rest is just f1 stuff and arrogance that needs to change. this feels a bit like the 2009 banking drama in f1 terms in that respect, though i feel the end result will be the same - bailed out, no real changes made. just wanted to thank the legal minded on this thread for explaining it for the rest of us. top work, chaps. |
|
__________________
devils advocate in-chief and professional arguer of both sides |
25 Jun 2020, 10:36 (Ref:3983747) | #97 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,431
|
Good points Bella, although I do think chucking out a $100m income to use a customer version of the then next worst engine that must have cost circa $30m is fairly described as a vanity project.
And a seemingly endless plethora of new road car models is not just F1 stuff. |
|
|
25 Jun 2020, 11:00 (Ref:3983751) | #98 | |
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 1998
Posts: 16,760
|
agree, the road car approach of creating a vast number of models has confused me no end - surely it’s diluting the brand, which is still incredibly young in covetable sports car terms. not sure how much of it was driven by the desire to compete in the gt racing market, but it feels like the answer is “a lot”.
i wonder how much of the expansion was driven by business plans to creditors that promised that kind of demand and expansion to get the money. |
|
__________________
devils advocate in-chief and professional arguer of both sides |
25 Jun 2020, 11:21 (Ref:3983758) | #99 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 18,692
|
It seems the road cars were driven by a desire to compete in GT endurance racing. Certainly wasn’t their worst idea at the time at least, but I worry for those jobs in their road car sector, as no doubt the F1 team will probably be seen as more important
|
|
__________________
He who dares wins! He who hesitates is lost! |
25 Jun 2020, 11:54 (Ref:3983769) | #100 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,213
|
Quote:
Ferrari of today is brilliant at marketing, they keep production below demand, they have a product range of not essentially similar versions of the same (ish) car and they have the special versions that they limit even further to key customers, so even hardended businessman feel grateful to Ferrari for allowing them to buy one of their cars. You need good build quality and reliability, long gone are the days when this profile of buyer will accept a poor car or poor reliabilty. Many supercars are sold on finance so the residuals are key to enabling your customer to move into the next model. Possibly some or all of the above are allegdly where McLaren's Road cars problems sit. Even with the world as it is, the number of people who can afford supercars is tiny in the scheme of things, then factor in the number of those who want them and then it is smaller still. Even on PCP finace you would proably have to put a deposit down equivalent to what some people earn in a year, with monthly payments of more than most people earn - and this is for a 3rd or 4th car aside from all their other commitments. On another point, I read that a sale and leasback of the McLaren factory is one option being considered. Many struggling retailers and care home groups have tried this before, often they are disasterous and end up with the business losing their key assets and gaining a liability, which can become unaffordable. |
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Will Bathurst get its funding ???? | marcus | Australasian Touring Cars. | 12 | 18 Jan 2002 11:34 |