|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
27 Feb 2013, 02:41 (Ref:3211456) | #1 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 294
|
Excitement at all-time low?
It seems to me that this has to be the lowest enthusiasm I have seen for this series since its existence. When I come on here in the middle of the day and I only see 1 person viewing this forum we can at least surmise that interest had dwindled to a new low for 10 Tenths members.
It sounds crazy but I believe when Champ Car was still in existence more people seemed to care on both sides because there was a foolish ideological racing war they were fighting. Since the buyout and the unification I see less and less people on forums all over the internet discussing the series and viewership has god down as well for the Indy Car Racing League or Indycar if you prefer. Even with an ugly new car, and American champion, decent racing, and an exciting finish at Indy things seem worse than last year. Maybe the firing of Randy Bernard and the decision not to introduce aero kits has taken whatever steam the series had in its sales but things do not look good. What are your thoughts small nitch group of racing fans lol |
||
__________________
The Best Racing I've Ever Seen IndyCar 1979 - 1995. |
27 Feb 2013, 09:59 (Ref:3211571) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 551
|
I think this is absurd...last season we saw one of the best seasons of the last 30 years, with a lot of battles, fantastic races often uncertain until the last laps...we saw one of the best Indy 500 maybe ever...we saw oval races without pack racing as the majority of fans wanted...we saw 90s oval races style...I have the same question: why we have to be always so pessimistic?
|
||
|
27 Feb 2013, 10:34 (Ref:3211581) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,900
|
We are enduring the longest off season in years, there isn't news every day either. It's only a few weeks until St Pete. I'm sure things will pick up then.
|
||
__________________
I can't drive 55. |
27 Feb 2013, 11:09 (Ref:3211591) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,320
|
The politics/economics of this series is fairly crushing and listing off the drivers who have been sent packing because they can't strum up the necessary cash and so have to make way for those who do, well it's a hard slog discussing that. There's no two bits about it, this series is in a tough position and discussing the off-track antics only underlines that.
I'm sure things will pick up though when the racing starts. |
||
__________________
If I had asked my customer what they wanted, they would've said a faster horse. -Henry Ford |
27 Feb 2013, 11:17 (Ref:3211598) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,589
|
The continual foot-shooting, the empty grandstands, (in the UK) the trials and tribulations of just trying to see the flippin races......
It all adds up and wears you down. I'm going to the 500 this year, very much looking forward to it. |
||
|
27 Feb 2013, 12:54 (Ref:3211646) | #6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,900
|
This your first 500, Pete? My first was last year... bloody awesome experience!
|
||
__________________
I can't drive 55. |
27 Feb 2013, 13:03 (Ref:3211649) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,589
|
Indeed. I combed the forum for Indy tips a while ago and remember reading a few of your posts. Very helpful.
|
||
|
27 Feb 2013, 15:35 (Ref:3211703) | #8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
Quote:
Now there is almost nothing to report or talk about, except maybe who is leaving. |
||
__________________
Wolverines! |
27 Feb 2013, 15:44 (Ref:3211707) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
Quote:
What should be of most concern to the irl fans, is well where are they? A lot of the stalwarts who fought tooth and nail for the irl during the Great War hardly darken the door anymore. I think the ship has sailed and this is dead series walking. Everyone has moved on and I don't think they'll be back. The only way out is to sell to someone willing to invest and change things to make it more up to date and interesting. In this economy there are probably very few people out there that would have an interest in it. I know there were some people before but the family wants an outrageous sum for a dead horse of a series. |
||
__________________
Wolverines! |
28 Feb 2013, 07:14 (Ref:3212091) | #10 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,963
|
Quote:
Also your last line should read - where are the open wheel fans. This isnt IRL vs Champcar anymore mate. Its Indycar and we are all one group of fans these days. Thanks for your enlightening input though |
|||
__________________
Upon entry into the Bathurst 1000, it should be mandatory to view the compelling "Moffat - Man and the Mountain" film |
28 Feb 2013, 08:33 (Ref:3212111) | #11 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,589
|
I think what he is getting at is that is that during the split, each set of fans were passionate and wanted their championship to succeed which gave each one 'life', for a while.
The merge left all of us with one product that neither side seems to particually cares for as it it's not the thing they championed. It's not IRL, it's not champcar. It's a mish mash of both, seemingly only incorporating the worst of each! The new car has produced some good racing, true. But it's too slow and butt-ugly (designed by committee, not for purpose) and getting it was a farce. |
||
|
28 Feb 2013, 08:34 (Ref:3212113) | #12 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 637
|
Quote:
|
||
|
28 Feb 2013, 11:35 (Ref:3212214) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,320
|
The car is a mixed bag at best. It's expensive and ugly but it can usually race. I don't think that's enough though.
I sometimes get resistance for saying this but the car does need to look the part if the series want to wrest itself from the doldrums. Life-rafts on wheels, granted that can race, give off a mixed impression, IMO. I think there's good discussion on this section but it's a tough slog because the series is in a tough state. There's no escaping that. If you want just to unquestioningly cheerlead the series and dislike forthright analysis, then I don't recommend this section, no. For me telling the truth, is performing a real service in a way that being a 'yes' man isn't [ or being a 'no' man for that matter either.] |
||
__________________
If I had asked my customer what they wanted, they would've said a faster horse. -Henry Ford |
28 Feb 2013, 13:44 (Ref:3212278) | #14 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,963
|
Who is cheerleading the series?
Forthright analysis yes - but pushing the same agenda by adding nothing new since 2008? How is that useful? |
||
__________________
Upon entry into the Bathurst 1000, it should be mandatory to view the compelling "Moffat - Man and the Mountain" film |
28 Feb 2013, 13:59 (Ref:3212283) | #15 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,098
|
Quote:
And I could not care less either, because I don't pay the racing action, sitting here in Europe, having watched it on youtube. Basically, it's the cast of characters and their attitude which makes a forum a nice place. On other forums, I've often seen the tendency that people with rather radical views can easily scare away new registrants which otherwise would have brought something productive to the table, but then did not because they did not like the atmosphere. I'm sorry to say that's what I have witnessed happening to this board, too. So your observation of low enthusiasm is not down to what happened in racing last year at all, but is rooted in a more general internet phenomenon: the people who like the sport having moved elsewhere to discuss it or read about it: me included. That's one internet phenomenon (online migration movement) answering another (concern trolling). I liked this place a lot but not that much anymore since last winter. The racing action was indeed pretty good overall in 2012 and is no reason at all for me not starting new threads. Goodbye. |
||
|
28 Feb 2013, 14:41 (Ref:3212298) | #16 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,320
|
Quote:
In short, people's remarks either stand or fall on the substance of their remarks themselves and not whether they happen to be praiseworthy/critical. |
|||
__________________
If I had asked my customer what they wanted, they would've said a faster horse. -Henry Ford |
28 Feb 2013, 15:33 (Ref:3212310) | #17 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
Quote:
Results matter and for all your exhortations, TV ratings fell again last year and the series struggles to hold onto venues. One would think if this car was so successful and well received, tv and attendance would have jumped by 50%. Your one group of fans is very small, enough to fit in one room. Even the inside the beltway crowd that supported the irl from the beginning have all vanished. I haven't seen any of them post here for ages and when I looked at trackforum last year, seems like many of the original fans and supporters have just given up. I'd say outside the Nascar the only buzz I have seen is for Robby Gordon's new Stadium Trucks. Haven't seen any press coverage for the irl since rodeo randy got canned, other than little blurbs of nothing in the specialized press. |
||
__________________
Wolverines! |
28 Feb 2013, 15:43 (Ref:3212314) | #18 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
Quote:
|
||
__________________
Wolverines! |
28 Feb 2013, 19:36 (Ref:3212376) | #19 | |||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,356
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
28 Feb 2013, 19:49 (Ref:3212379) | #20 | |||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,356
|
Quote:
I just wonder what the reaction of fans would have been and what the knock on effect of that would have been, regarding TV viewing figures and race track attendance, if the ICONIC Committee had gone for a car more in keeping with a car from the CART era? |
|||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
28 Feb 2013, 20:45 (Ref:3212402) | #21 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
Quote:
A lot of people want a one way of thinking with no dissension, but society has never progressed without ideas being discussed and challenged. DRT and a couple of others wants no one to be critical of the irl, yet that isn't the reality of the situation is it? Even the devout inside the 465 beltway fans have disappeared from this forum rather than still being here cranking out the PR and talking up their series. Results matter and if the irl was so super fabulous, there would be heaps to discuss but there is not. |
||
__________________
Wolverines! |
28 Feb 2013, 21:23 (Ref:3212411) | #22 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
Quote:
Instead of being so insular, they should have designed a new formula that would have allowed multiple constructors to compete, maybe even with different types of engines. You would have ended up with something much more exciting people might want to see and follow. Car companies and others would have also been more excited over something different they could demonstrate technology with. Instead the teams have a car the teams can't stand that is basically an over priced indy lights car with 550 hp and the public has demonstrated no interest in. Because teams and their former subcontractors can't fabricate any of their parts and it's just a spec car, most teams layoff a lot of their team members now each October. Now they are up a chicken wire boat up a creek deserted by their own hardcore fans, with teams not happy and fans not happy. The only thing to do now is scrub it all clean and start over. |
||
__________________
Wolverines! |
28 Feb 2013, 22:03 (Ref:3212421) | #23 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,320
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
If I had asked my customer what they wanted, they would've said a faster horse. -Henry Ford |
1 Mar 2013, 00:05 (Ref:3212479) | #24 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 111
|
I don't intend to "leave" or anything, but there is a bit of a low of excitement for IndyCar everywhere. Bad cars, bad schedule, bad ratings, bad finances, and now that Randy is gone, management bad enough to make the NHL look competent. What's the silver lining? The Indy 500? It's great, but it's one race. And there's also the issue that for those of us who don't bother getting cable, ABC is only carrying the damn oval races. If I wanted to see cars drive around in circles for a couple of hours I'd watch NASCAR, and I don't like NASCAR.
|
||
|
1 Mar 2013, 01:19 (Ref:3212506) | #25 | |||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,356
|
Quote:
F1 continues to generate interest, especially this time of the year with the teams launching their new cars and then testing them. What's new in IndyCar this year that's generating that sort of interest? Nothing as far as I can see. |
|||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Low budget = Low performance? | XW GT | Australasian Touring Cars. | 8 | 6 Jun 2006 10:37 |
Speeds and Excitement | perminder | Formula One | 32 | 18 Oct 2004 17:32 |
MPH hits all time low | rush1 | ChampCar World Series | 15 | 14 Aug 2002 03:04 |
Excitement! | Diabando | Formula One | 15 | 28 Feb 2001 04:35 |