Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Single Seater Racing > Formula One

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 25 Jan 2002, 11:31 (Ref:204119)   #1
RWC
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location:
Qld.-australia
Posts: 2,083
RWC should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
jaguar's problems

Ouch.Jag has problems allready!Not a good start.they did all the sensible things though...isolate the problem(it's ONLY a front wing ,the rest is good)and get on with fixing it,which they will do.Just a shame it's holding up the rest of the program though.One of the things that surprised me was that the R3 is 30kg lighter than the R2!I didn't think they could lose that much-was last years car a porker?
RWC is offline  
Quote
Old 25 Jan 2002, 11:49 (Ref:204129)   #2
M Power
Racer
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location:
Cronulla Australia
Posts: 156
M Power should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid

WAIT !!! I found Jag's problem .. There owned by FORD
sorry I had to say it!



But I really hope that Jag pickup this year
M Power is offline  
Quote
Old 25 Jan 2002, 15:25 (Ref:204241)   #3
Neil C
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
United Nations
People's Republic of Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 1,038
Neil C should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Was last years Jag a porker? In more ways than one, RWC.

M Powder, if not for Ford, there would likely not even be a Jaguar road car today, much less an F1 effort. But I haven't heard about that Jag pickup you mentioned? When can I buy one?
Neil C is offline  
Quote
Old 25 Jan 2002, 15:29 (Ref:204242)   #4
Gt_R
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location:
Singapore
Posts: 5,917
Gt_R should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridGt_R should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Jaguar's main problem is that they are trying too hard to build up an image for themselves more that building up a good car. Lauda and Irvine seems to love talking to the press more than working on their cars...and come up with strange antics to keep themselves on the front page. "Jaguar in fight for newey" "Lauda wants to be a monkey" "Irvine says he stays"...

Perhaps they should just put aside their dream off building a "British Green Ferrari" and focus with their job. Fixing the problem with the car is a good start.
Gt_R is offline  
Quote
Old 25 Jan 2002, 15:33 (Ref:204247)   #5
Damon
Veteran
 
Damon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
United Kingdom
Hampshire, England
Posts: 5,577
Damon should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
When I read the title I thought this thread would be about Lauda . To sort their problems they should get rid of Mr Parmalout and Eddie Irvine, and reinstate Sir Bobby!! Lauda is a waste of space, look at all the success he had as 'advisor' to Ferrari in the mid 90's, the minute he left the team began to improve.
Damon is offline  
Quote
Old 26 Jan 2002, 13:38 (Ref:204695)   #6
timbo2001
Racer
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location:
Australia
Posts: 130
timbo2001 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Geez, not only does it go slow, it LOOKS slow, bulky and ugly, this car should go down in history as one of the worst looking F1 cars ever. Get rid of Lauda and Irvine, and the team might be able to solve its other problems in a more serious and professional manner.
timbo2001 is offline  
Quote
Old 26 Jan 2002, 14:27 (Ref:204717)   #7
Nicholas
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
United Kingdom
Posts: 1,953
Nicholas should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I didn't think it looked that bad and that by copying Ferrari (ie doing a Prost ) they might come 7th instead of 8th this year. Oh well. I like the paint scheme...

What I don't understand is that this car was designed by the man who penned Mclaren's '88 car, Steve Nichols....
Nicholas is offline  
Quote
Old 26 Jan 2002, 16:12 (Ref:204777)   #8
RT
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
United States
Great Lakes Area
Posts: 615
RT should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridRT should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid

I once read about the color and its meaning that. Well..it was british, it was racing and it was green.... but it wasn't "british racing green". Jaguar has tried to emphasize image over performance and common sense. Right now it's a marketing tool for Ford and that's all there is to it and it won't be there for long if they continue with the lack of focus.

What really, really bugs me is that they took a perfectly good team (Stewart) with Ford sponsorship and all the historical connections to the bygone years of joint anglo-american racing success and turned it into a commedy of errors with two aging drivers. Even now, I don't see championship material in their lineup.

I wish they'd bring Sir Jackie back to the helm and give him a free hand to rebuild his team. He'll know where to look for good young drivers, english or not. The team needs the Stewart tartan somewhere. It may look a lot better at the end of the races...when it counts.

RT is offline  
Quote
Old 26 Jan 2002, 16:24 (Ref:204781)   #9
Nicholas
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
United Kingdom
Posts: 1,953
Nicholas should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Does Stewart still have a role in the team?

I loved the old Stewart paint scheme as well
Nicholas is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Jan 2002, 06:31 (Ref:205070)   #10
RWC
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location:
Qld.-australia
Posts: 2,083
RWC should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Nicholaswhite i've also heard that quote alot-that steve nichols designed the 88 mac.But he did have the very best everything:The two best drivers,the best engine,copying the 86 brabham without the reliability troubles...He COULDN'T go far wrong with those ingredients.At jag he has the similar stuff to work with as every other team.
Has anyone got a link to a good jag pic?
RWC is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Jan 2002, 10:13 (Ref:205116)   #11
nobjockey
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 33
nobjockey should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
What I find incredible about this situation at Jaguar is they have the likes of Nichols and Handford (an aerodynamic genius were told) gerzillions of dollars, all the resources that all those dollars can buy including the facilities that the Ford Motor Company can provide and they make a dodgy front wing.

I think some P45's should be given out here the first one to Lauda.
nobjockey is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Jan 2002, 11:04 (Ref:205141)   #12
Number Juan
Veteran
 
Number Juan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Tajikstan
Sussex, UK
Posts: 1,134
Number Juan has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!


it does astound me that with all this money they cant even make a half decent car when we see teams like minardi and prost with at least a 1/4 of that money either out-qualifying them or qualifying only 1-2 seconds behind them!!! its madness i tells ya!!!
Number Juan is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Jan 2002, 11:23 (Ref:205156)   #13
Damon
Veteran
 
Damon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
United Kingdom
Hampshire, England
Posts: 5,577
Damon should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
BAR are the same, they've realised that you can't just throw cash at the team if its not hitting the target.
Damon is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Jan 2002, 17:14 (Ref:205383)   #14
Nicholas
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
United Kingdom
Posts: 1,953
Nicholas should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
There's no point having money if you can't use it properly and hire the right people.
Nicholas is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Jan 2002, 17:24 (Ref:205393)   #15
Number Juan
Veteran
 
Number Juan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Tajikstan
Sussex, UK
Posts: 1,134
Number Juan has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
which means the Jaguar problems arent just on track, theyre deep rooted - bad management and bad admin. this is where P45's will become common things!!!

Jaguar: fire your management, get new people in - and start winning!!!
Number Juan is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Jan 2002, 17:26 (Ref:205394)   #16
EERO
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
 
EERO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
United States
Massachusetts
Posts: 5,306
EERO should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridEERO should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridEERO should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridEERO should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by Damon
To sort their problems they should get rid of Mr Parmalout and Eddie Irvine, and reinstate Sir Bobby!!


I couldn't agree more, I am not convinced by Lauda's ability to run the team and Irvive is past due. They need to throw their resources behind a hot young driver and build toward the future. I also don't understand why everyone wants to take shots a Ford. The Le Mans campaigns of the Sixties were magnificent and they single-handedly kept F1 going through the Cosworth DFV era. I will grant that they exibited extreme hubris with the way they eviscerated the Stewart team and launched Jaguar. I thought that Rahal's appointment was the sign that they had recognized that they needed a no-nonsense racer at the helm.

I believe that Ford's long term goals will triumph in the end. They know what it takes to succede and they will be wiling to make the effort. This latest debacle with a wonky front wing isn't going to help their progress.
EERO is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Jan 2002, 18:43 (Ref:205426)   #17
nobjockey
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 33
nobjockey should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I have to say that Rahal's appointment to the Jaguar team was a total mystery to me. On what basis does he qualify to direct a team with a disasterous track record to a F1 world championship?

What Jag need is someone who has done it or been very close before.
nobjockey is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Jan 2002, 20:31 (Ref:205461)   #18
Alan Jones
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location:
Central Coast
Posts: 2,012
Alan Jones should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I've gotta set up my tent in EERO's camp as I too feel it would be great to see Ford / Jaguar competing with the topguns. I am fairly sure Ford are the most successful of all the manufacturer's in the history of F1 and hope they can get add a few more titles etc to the record books. Obviously, to accomplish this there needs to be a long term plan in mind and hopefully in the next 3 years they can lay the foundations to set themselves up for a title fight.

Go the Blue Oval
Alan Jones is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Jan 2002, 20:44 (Ref:205466)   #19
Damon
Veteran
 
Damon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
United Kingdom
Hampshire, England
Posts: 5,577
Damon should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by nobjockey

What Jag need is someone who has done it or been very close before.
I believe Frank Williams, Ron Dennis and Jean Todt are all taken unfortunatly.
Damon is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Jan 2002, 22:15 (Ref:205515)   #20
EERO
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
 
EERO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
United States
Massachusetts
Posts: 5,306
EERO should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridEERO should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridEERO should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridEERO should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by nobjockey
I have to say that Rahal's appointment to the Jaguar team was a total mystery to me. On what basis does he qualify to direct a team with a disasterous track record to a F1 world championship?

What Jag need is someone who has done it or been very close before.
I would credit Rahal's manner; his determination, his support of his people, and his ability to engender their loyalty, his astounding professionalism and unflappable manner. He was a racer through and through with not an ounce of BS in him, unlike "Niki Waldheim".

Recall that Todt was a rallyist, and the Sir Frank had ben kicking around the lower reaches of F1 for 10 years before success came his way. Two of the three most successful Team leaders are proof that successs at F1 does not stem directly from a suriteit of driving talent or a political background in F1. What matters is ability and adaptability-two things Rahal had in spades.
EERO is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Jan 2002, 23:03 (Ref:205550)   #21
Mania
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location:
Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 1,434
Mania should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
This will be another testing season for them but they should be able to finish ahead of the likes of BAR, Sauber, and possibly Arrows.

I think Jaguar will make the grade in due course. I never expected them to be able to challenge for an occasional win until 2005 at the earliest. Fluke wins like Stewart's in 99 are obviously impossible to predict but on merit Jaguar always had a long way to go.

Nikki Lauda is a man who can get the job done. I think he`s good enough to get results if he hangs around long enough. Rahal was a strange appointment purely because he had no prior F1 experience and he was thurst into a prominent role in a team that was just starting up. So he got the short end of the bargain. Lauda should have been running this team since day one IMO.
Mania is offline  
Quote
Old 28 Jan 2002, 00:56 (Ref:205588)   #22
Mr V
Veteran
 
Mr V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
England
The city of bridges (one day!)
Posts: 13,211
Mr V has a real shot at the championship!Mr V has a real shot at the championship!Mr V has a real shot at the championship!Mr V has a real shot at the championship!Mr V has a real shot at the championship!
Quote:
Originally posted by Number Juan


it does astound me that with all this money they cant even make a half decent car when we see teams like minardi and prost with at least a 1/4 of that money either out-qualifying them or qualifying only 1-2 seconds behind them!!! its madness i tells ya!!!

isn't this the same as a certain team always decked out in red for about 21 years??......ferrari threw money at wasted championships left right and centre, but they got there in the end.

jaguar have got to do the same......the only difference is, ford are more likely to pull jaguar out of f1 than lose face (even more), this was never an option for ferrari.....they always had time on their side.
Mr V is offline  
Quote
Old 28 Jan 2002, 07:22 (Ref:205671)   #23
Valve Bounce
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Australia
Home :)
Posts: 7,491
Valve Bounce has been held in scrutiny for further testing
Quote:
Originally posted by EERO


..........and they (Ford) single-handedly kept F1 going through the Cosworth DFV era.
Sorry EERO, I just couldn't let this one go. Ford had very little to do with the Cosworth engine apart from putting in a limited amount of cash during the development stage. Ford won big time in getting their name on an engine and into F1 when they did very little.
I agree that the management of Jaguar is lacking, top heavy, lacks focus, but that will be their problem this year also. Just how could they hire Rahal to manage the team, then hire Niki who then fired Rahal? There cannot be loyalty in such a team and their morale must be hitting rock bottom.
Valve Bounce is offline  
Quote
Old 28 Jan 2002, 10:12 (Ref:205700)   #24
Super Tourer
Subscriber
Veteran
 
Super Tourer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
United Kingdom
East Anglia
Posts: 4,304
Super Tourer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridSuper Tourer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridSuper Tourer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridSuper Tourer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
The problem with Jag is that they have had valuable lesson's played out in front of them that they never learn from.

Lauda makes a great figurehead and soundbite quoter for the media, but as a manager forget it. Even his own airline went virually broke so as a businessman he scores nil as well.

IMO Jag thought they would P*** F1 with a bit more cash to play with, yet the results show that both Jag and BAR have spent a lot to get nowhere.

They should have watched Sauber last year and seen what a simple yet effective car, driven by two hungry drivers can achieve. If I were Ford's board I would be asking NL, how a team that spent probably 50% less than Jag with NO expensive 'name' drivers - could finish 4th - and get him to do the same.

Despite what Ford may say in public, this is a make or break year for Jag - in marketing terms they will start to suffer from negative publicity - with their main rivals Merc & BMW winning races and Jag not even close.

IMO they either need to bin it in 2003 or have a complete clearout from top to bottom of the team - hire in some young talent - how about F3000 team owner David Sears as team manager - he knows how to win titles. Some talented up and coming engineers and two young, hungry drivers.

Banish Lauda, Irvine & De La Rosa. The irony is that in their attempts to 'de-stewartise' the team, Jag got rid of some good people - who largely contributed to the success of the team.
Super Tourer is offline  
Quote
Old 28 Jan 2002, 12:39 (Ref:205734)   #25
f1manoz
Veteran
 
f1manoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Australia
Lincolnshire, UK
Posts: 7,294
f1manoz should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridf1manoz should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridf1manoz should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Jaguar has many problems. Here are a few solutions:

1. At least get rid of Irvine, as he is paid way too much and delivering, frankly for what he's paid, very little. Monaco podium aside, Irvine has done nothing in his two years at Jaguar to warrant what he's paid.

However, I don't agree with all the negativity about PDLR. IMO he hasn't re-captured the form he had at Arrows, but 2001 was his settling in year, considering he was thrown in at the deep end. Give him at least half this year to prove himself.

2. Get a new team manager. I still feel sorry for Rahal as he was doing (and did) nothing wrong. And for all his talking, Lauda has done little to inspire confidence for 2002.

3. New design department. Frankly, it appears this years R3 is going to be as bad, if not worse, than the previous two efforts. The Cosworth has proven to be quite a powerful unit, so obviously it is the chassis which is letting down the package.


If Jaguar again fail to deliver any substantial results (I'm talking of at least 5 to 7 podiums along with a win, maybe a couple of poles) in the next two years, then Ford should shut up shop and go back to what they were good at - being engines suppliers.

Quite frankly, Ford seem to be going out of their way to destroying the prestige of the Jaguar name.
f1manoz is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
First problems for the MP4/18 Inigo Montoya Formula One 18 24 May 2003 01:41
Problems With DSC??? Try Hard Sportscar & GT Racing 36 27 Feb 2003 01:29
Problems, problems... Nicholas Formula One 14 23 Feb 2002 03:39
Who is Jaguar's backup Driver? Ed G Formula One 10 7 Jul 2001 19:36
Jaguar's dream team ? Craig Formula One 12 7 Feb 2001 09:55


All times are GMT. The time now is 23:09.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.