![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 867
![]() |
What do u think of Coleshill & Harrington Park?
Hi I designed those tracks and I wouls like to know what the public thought of them...
|
||
![]() |
__________________
CG ![]() |
![]() |
#2 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 412
![]() |
They were very well done indeed! I especially enjoyed Harrington Park layout. The only thing that I might change would be the length of the Coleshill Circuit. At 2.4 miles, it may be a bit cramped, being a figure eight. Changing the scale a bit, so insted of 2.4 miles in length, it might be closer to 3.4 miles. It still is a well done track either way.
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 867
![]() |
Yes actually I ment to put 3.5 miles, oh well..
|
||
![]() |
__________________
CG ![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 313
![]() |
I'll change it to 3.5 miles at the next update in that case...
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 586
![]() |
The drivers would love Harrington Park with its fast corners, but it would fall foul of the same problems as Silverstone and Suzuka. There is a distinct lack of passing opportunities; Harry's Bend is the best place but following cars would fall back going through field (just as they do going through Estoril at Magny Cours).
Aparet from that they look good |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Park Life, 25 years of Lurgan Park Rally | M.Lowe | Rallying & Rallycross | 3 | 5 Dec 2005 18:04 |
Oulton Park - Wet and Dry | KennyG | Motorsport Art & Photography | 8 | 21 Jun 2005 22:31 |
MALLORY PARK, NR HINCKLEY, LEICESTERSHIREMallory Park, VSCC racing at its best. | eclectic | Historic Racing Today | 25 | 2 Aug 2004 18:32 |
Mallory Park | Mark Mitchell | Marshals Forum | 38 | 21 Feb 2003 08:31 |
Morgan Park | Rotary | Australasian Touring Cars. | 8 | 24 Mar 2002 04:38 |