Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Saloon & Sportscar Racing > Sportscar & GT Racing

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11 Jul 2004, 21:34 (Ref:1033457)   #1
sbrm
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 7
sbrm should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
QUestion about GTS rules

Interpretation question

Does article 16.3.1 which defines modifications mean that engine and gearbox mounting other than factory stock is not when allowed when the factory stock chassis is made from carbon fibre?

16.3.1 says:

"...Carbon Chassis: the chassis homolgated for the road must not undergo modifications. The mounting points for various mechanical elements fixed on the carbon parts of the chassis(engine, gear-box, suspension,steering etc., must be those used on the road car. No reinforcement will be permitted apart from those necessary for the installation of fuel equipment or rollover structure in the cockpit..."

While a GTS car must not use its engine as a stressed member it would seem quite common practice to use engine mounting to strengthen chassis stiffness. This doesn't seem to be permitted with a carbon chassis. Interesting if you wanted to convert an Ferrari ENZO to GTS you might be able to additional brace the engine and gearbox to the metal subframe, but not to any of the carbon part of the chassis.

It wouldn't affect the Corvette and the Saleen as they are not primarily carbon chassis!

Any thoughts

Stephen
sbrm is offline  
Quote
Old 11 Jul 2004, 21:47 (Ref:1033477)   #2
JAG
Veteran
 
JAG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
England
Posts: 10,500
JAG should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridJAG should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridJAG should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
The carbon chassied 'Supercars' are built to regs similar to the N-GT/GT cars like the 911/360 which allow less modifications.

The theory is these 'supercars' are already sufficiently developed for racing that fewer mods are needed on these cars. Plus the costs of developing a carbon chssied car are kept down.

Last edited by JAG; 11 Jul 2004 at 21:51.
JAG is offline  
Quote
Old 12 Jul 2004, 02:52 (Ref:1033635)   #3
sbrm
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 7
sbrm should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Thanks

Thanks for your reply, just if I was interpreting correctly.
sbrm is offline  
Quote
Old 12 Jul 2004, 06:33 (Ref:1033729)   #4
cybersdorf
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Austria
Vienna, Austria
Posts: 3,580
cybersdorf should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridcybersdorf should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by JAG
The theory is these 'supercars' are already sufficiently developed for racing that fewer mods are needed on these cars.
As we have seen with the Zonda.
cybersdorf is offline  
__________________
Oops
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Historic question: IMSA GTP rules 1982-19?? tamar North American Racing 5 31 Mar 2005 15:48
Question abt the 2004 lmp1 rules.... Hooper Sportscar & GT Racing 12 3 May 2004 16:52
a question about new quall-rules.. Fox Mulder Formula One 12 3 Mar 2003 18:02
The most important question concerning the new rules? z2252314 Formula One 4 22 Feb 2003 07:54
New Pit road rules question NASCAR_geM NASCAR & Stock Car Racing 4 11 Mar 2002 11:35


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:36.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.