Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Saloon & Sportscar Racing > Australasian Touring Cars.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 19 Aug 2004, 23:19 (Ref:1072103)   #1
steady1985
Rookie
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location:
Bathurst, NSW Australia
Posts: 17
steady1985 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Proposed racing category: Saloon Superstars

My father came up with this idea, but I've begun to create rules for it.

I've called it "Saloon Superstars". (and better names are welcome). It's a category for stock-standard naturally aspirated V8 saloon cars. The category is open to all manufacturers, though the emphasis is on Ford and Holden V8s.

For our purposes, a saloon car is defined as "A four door sedan with a seating capacity of five or more", and a car that is "stock-standard" is an exact version of the showroom car that can be purchased by the general public. This covers Ford XR8 Falcons and Holden SS Commodores's. Stock standard V8s.

The rules for entry are that the car must be stock standard (with the obvious exception of an approved rollcage), roadworthy and registered, and fit the criteria stated above. It must also be able to be purchased brand-new, so if it is off the market, and cannot be purchased brand-new, it will not be eligible. Models recently removed from the market will have a maximum 2 season grace period, during which no new entrants of this model will be accepted, and after which current users will be required to upgrade to the new models. If the model is pushed out less than 6 months into the new year, the grace period will expire at the end of the year. Otherwise, it will end at the end of the year after.

During races, changing tyres will only be done with the equipment that comes with the car. No other equipment is to be used for changing tyres.

If this category does well, a class could be opened up for V6 saloon cars, allowing a diversity of cars to compete. The same rules regarding body, seating and engine aspiration will apply.

If promoted correctly, a category like this could be a formidable rival to, and maybe even overshadow, the V8 supercars series.

As this category is in a draft stage, all ideas will be taken into account, so if you have any to offer, e-mail me at aaron@mason.id.au or reply to this post.
steady1985 is offline  
Quote
Old 19 Aug 2004, 23:35 (Ref:1072111)   #2
Just Do It!
Veteran
 
Just Do It!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location:
New Zealand
Posts: 4,379
Just Do It! should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridJust Do It! should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridJust Do It! should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
I would enter a stock standard BMW 745i and beat everyone else hands down with traction control and ABS and simply outstanding handling.

GTR will be stoked when you get the 6 cylinder category going. I see a bright future for him in a Mitsubishi VR-X!

Parity would be your biggest challenge. When you look at the demise of Procar, which really was kept afloat by one man's dream and wallet, then you will soon probably realise the challenge that you have ahead of you.

What you might be wiser to do is to look at the New Zealand Super GT Series and try to develop that into a ctaegory in Australia, which really offers all-comers racing with some very exciting cars.

I don't want to sound like a critic to your dream, but I just hope that you look at every element before you jump in.
Just Do It! is offline  
__________________
Tranquillity - What happens inside Shane's race car. Chaos - What happens outside Jamie's race car.
Quote
Old 19 Aug 2004, 23:53 (Ref:1072121)   #3
steady1985
Rookie
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location:
Bathurst, NSW Australia
Posts: 17
steady1985 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
I would enter a stock standard BMW 745i and beat everyone else hands down with traction control and ABS and simply outstanding handling.
As long as it has a naturally aspirated V8 under the hood, bring it along. We'd love to have you.

Parity will be difficult... but just look at GT-P. You've got 2-litre straight-fours rubbing the noses of 5+litre V8s in the dust.

Question is, will people pay to see their favourite car win, or to see exciting racing with cars they can actually buy? Cause if the first is the case, then this idea will be a flop.
steady1985 is offline  
Quote
Old 20 Aug 2004, 00:11 (Ref:1072132)   #4
Gav56
Racer
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location:
Brisbane
Posts: 101
Gav56 has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
This class would be good for my new E55 AMG Benz..(sorry its supercharged) I'll buy a new C55 AMG.
Gav56 is offline  
Quote
Old 20 Aug 2004, 00:14 (Ref:1072135)   #5
worried
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 75
worried should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
NOt another V8 category - how many more are there going to be?

Why is it people don't realise that there is more to racing than having 8 cylinders in the engine?

As for getting people to pay -debatable. Get name drivers they can relate to and it mught work - but first you need to get away from the 8 cylinder fixation.
worried is offline  
Quote
Old 20 Aug 2004, 00:19 (Ref:1072141)   #6
steady1985
Rookie
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location:
Bathurst, NSW Australia
Posts: 17
steady1985 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I know there is... but there are a lot of people who don't - and thats what we're capitalising on.

As you can see from the first post, we also hope to appeal to the rest who've seen the light with a V6 class. They'll race alongside the V8s and should (hopefully) make for some interesting, close racing.
steady1985 is offline  
Quote
Old 20 Aug 2004, 00:47 (Ref:1072160)   #7
Driver
Racer
 
Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Australia
Bundaberg, Queensland
Posts: 151
Driver should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
What about the Falcon and BMW's. Are they allowed to race in a V6 class? BMW M3 CSL yum.
Driver is offline  
__________________
There is nothing worse than aggressive stupidity.
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749 - 1832)
Quote
Old 20 Aug 2004, 00:49 (Ref:1072161)   #8
Just Do It!
Veteran
 
Just Do It!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location:
New Zealand
Posts: 4,379
Just Do It! should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridJust Do It! should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridJust Do It! should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Bring that on......re: HRT dominance of an era gone
Just Do It! is offline  
__________________
Tranquillity - What happens inside Shane's race car. Chaos - What happens outside Jamie's race car.
Quote
Old 20 Aug 2004, 00:56 (Ref:1072166)   #9
steady1985
Rookie
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location:
Bathurst, NSW Australia
Posts: 17
steady1985 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by Driver
What about the Falcon and BMW's. Are they allowed to race in a V6 class? BMW M3 CSL yum.
Why not? As long as its a naturally aspirated V6.

(note: V6 not straight-six. i'm sure there's a difference. if there isn't, let me know.)
steady1985 is offline  
Quote
Old 20 Aug 2004, 01:37 (Ref:1072184)   #10
Senna05
Veteran
 
Senna05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Australia
Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Posts: 1,269
Senna05 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Falcon uses straight 6 technology, as I'm sure some bimmers do too.
Senna05 is offline  
__________________
"Racing.....it's in my blood."
Quote
Old 20 Aug 2004, 01:52 (Ref:1072191)   #11
Morris 1100
Veteran
 
Morris 1100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location:
Here.
Posts: 1,622
Morris 1100 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
The trouble with touring car rules is one car will be better than another.
Nobody wants to race a car that can not win. So they buy the one that will win.
Manufacturers do not want to risk losing or having their weak spots shown in public.
The spectators do not want to watch a race with only one brand winning all the time.

The ideal set of rules need to give all cars an equal chance of winning. The rules for Group A had some good features like a sliding scale of tyre width, fuel tank size and car weight set by the engine capacity. The problem was the way the rules equated turbo engines and this was the main downfall of group A. (besides homologation)
Morris 1100 is offline  
Quote
Old 20 Aug 2004, 03:18 (Ref:1072222)   #12
Driver
Racer
 
Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Australia
Bundaberg, Queensland
Posts: 151
Driver should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
The Falcon and the BMW 6's are inline 6's. Why everyone is all revved up about V6 I don't know. The V6 has only a packaging advantage ie: it is shorter and that is it.
Driver is offline  
__________________
There is nothing worse than aggressive stupidity.
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749 - 1832)
Quote
Old 20 Aug 2004, 03:21 (Ref:1072224)   #13
aj_308
Veteran
 
aj_308's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Australia
Sydney, Australia
Posts: 790
aj_308 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
better weight distribution..
aj_308 is offline  
Quote
Old 20 Aug 2004, 03:27 (Ref:1072226)   #14
Driver
Racer
 
Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Australia
Bundaberg, Queensland
Posts: 151
Driver should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I am sure there is nothing wrong with the weight distrubution of a M3. A Falcon might be another matter. But that is still because the V6 is shorter.

But basically steady1985, there is no reason why straight 6 can compete against a V6.
Driver is offline  
__________________
There is nothing worse than aggressive stupidity.
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749 - 1832)
Quote
Old 20 Aug 2004, 04:43 (Ref:1072248)   #15
steady1985
Rookie
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location:
Bathurst, NSW Australia
Posts: 17
steady1985 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Probably. But it's the whole 'V' thing, that's all it is.

I'll discuss it with my old man, who came up with the idea in the first place, and I'll get back to you.

Last edited by steady1985; 20 Aug 2004 at 04:43.
steady1985 is offline  
Quote
Old 20 Aug 2004, 04:55 (Ref:1072257)   #16
Bigguy
Racer
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location:
Sydney
Posts: 472
Bigguy should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Tell 'im he's dreamin'. There is no way that another class, which offers nothing innovative compared to anything already in place, has any chance of happening. Sorry.
Bigguy is offline  
Quote
Old 20 Aug 2004, 05:08 (Ref:1072267)   #17
steady1985
Rookie
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location:
Bathurst, NSW Australia
Posts: 17
steady1985 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
So we're dreaming. Dreams never die. And it takes an unblinking eye to make those dreams a reality.

Not saying that it will be a reality. But there's nothing to stop me from trying.
steady1985 is offline  
Quote
Old 20 Aug 2004, 06:32 (Ref:1072302)   #18
Just Do It!
Veteran
 
Just Do It!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location:
New Zealand
Posts: 4,379
Just Do It! should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridJust Do It! should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridJust Do It! should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Steady, you have the perfect attitude to make a success of yourself.

Live you dreams, the kickers will soon run out of energy, or stub their toes
Just Do It! is offline  
__________________
Tranquillity - What happens inside Shane's race car. Chaos - What happens outside Jamie's race car.
Quote
Old 21 Aug 2004, 07:30 (Ref:1073441)   #19
tiko
Racer
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location:
Australia
Posts: 448
tiko should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Re: Proposed racing category: Saloon Superstars

Quote:
Originally posted by steady1985

For our purposes, a saloon car is defined as "A four door sedan with a seating capacity of five or more", and a car that is "stock-standard" is an exact version of the showroom car that can be purchased by the general public. This covers Ford XR8 Falcons and Holden SS Commodores's. Stock standard V8s.
So does this rule out any stock CV8 Monaro's racing? Because it only has 4 seats.
tiko is offline  
Quote
Old 21 Aug 2004, 07:32 (Ref:1073444)   #20
bartman71
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location:
launceston tas
Posts: 520
bartman71 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Re: Re: Proposed racing category: Saloon Superstars

Quote:
Originally posted by tiko
So does this rule out any stock CV8 Monaro's racing? Because it only has 4 seats.
only has 2 doors too.
bartman71 is offline  
Quote
Old 23 Aug 2004, 10:35 (Ref:1074975)   #21
steady1985
Rookie
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location:
Bathurst, NSW Australia
Posts: 17
steady1985 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Ok, after viewing the concerns regarding V6's and straight-6's, I have made an amendment to the entry requirements.

The category will now accept any 8-cylinder car, be it V8 or inline-8, as wells as V6s and inline-6s. Same rules for aspiration will apply.

The latest regulations may be viewed by going to http://groups.msn.com/ProductionCarR...uperstars.msnw

(not an ad for my MSN group)
steady1985 is offline  
Quote
Old 23 Aug 2004, 10:45 (Ref:1074981)   #22
Morris 1100
Veteran
 
Morris 1100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location:
Here.
Posts: 1,622
Morris 1100 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Re: Proposed racing category: Saloon Superstars

I just noticed a problem with your rules....
Quote:
...The rules for entry are that the car must be stock standard (with the obvious exception of an approved rollcage), roadworthy and registered,
If you fit a roll cage the car is no longer roadworthy (in NSW anyway!)
Morris 1100 is offline  
Quote
Old 23 Aug 2004, 10:55 (Ref:1074994)   #23
steady1985
Rookie
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location:
Bathurst, NSW Australia
Posts: 17
steady1985 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Re: Re: Proposed racing category: Saloon Superstars

Quote:
Originally posted by Morris 1100
I just noticed a problem with your rules....


If you fit a roll cage the car is no longer roadworthy (in NSW anyway!)
Valid point. However, without the roll cage, I'm pretty sure a car can't race (at this level anyway).

I suppose I should move the parenthesised area after "roadworthy". Done, there thats better.
steady1985 is offline  
Quote
Old 23 Aug 2004, 11:07 (Ref:1075003)   #24
Morris 1100
Veteran
 
Morris 1100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location:
Here.
Posts: 1,622
Morris 1100 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
There is no real need to have rego on a race car anyway. (except for the midnight trips along the Bells Line of road to run the motor in!)
Morris 1100 is offline  
Quote
Old 23 Aug 2004, 11:12 (Ref:1075007)   #25
rdmdog
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Australia
Sydney, NSW, or a track near you
Posts: 1,890
rdmdog should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I havent read this thread word for word, for reasons that I will keep to myself, but there is a class that allows these cars top compete agains each other now.

Its called Improved Production.

You used to be able to race a car without a rollcage as long as it was road registered, god only knows why you would do that, but anyway I dont think this is allowed anymore.

When you race a road car, that is standard, ie NOT modified, the stock parts break, and cars fail. Therefore these cars become either unreliable, or very expensive.
rdmdog is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
50' Saloon racing SNH Motorsport History 22 7 Oct 2005 06:39
New racing category forum? skyblue National & International Single Seaters 3 24 Aug 2004 18:09
Saloon Car Racing COOPERMAN Motorsport History 15 18 May 2002 22:45
Saloon Racing M Power Australasian Touring Cars. 5 16 Feb 2002 13:22


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:51.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.