Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Single Seater Racing > Formula One

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 6 Oct 2004, 09:48 (Ref:1116647)   #1
sonic
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location:
London
Posts: 729
sonic should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Dallara F1 team for 2005 (rumour)

Now this is interesting.

autosport.com reporting that chassis making legends Dallara are planning an entry for 2006 but may buy Jaguar for a 2005 Entry.

Backers from Russia, etc.

I seem to recall their last foray into F1 was a bit Minardi-esque but with some proper backing - and if their cars in lower formulae are anything to go by - they could be a serious team.
sonic is offline  
Quote
Old 6 Oct 2004, 09:58 (Ref:1116656)   #2
climb
Veteran
 
climb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
St Pierre and Miquelon
closer than you thought!
Posts: 4,512
climb should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridclimb should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
dallara's last foray was manufacturing a car on behalf of Honda, in late 90's, when the japanese constructor planned to like Toyota would have done some years later.
That car was very good and topped some test times alongside current teams, but then the project was abandoned, mainly because of Harvey Postletwhite's sudden death, who convinced Honda to keep providing engines.

About this possibility. honestly I think that AFAN entering and getting the top is almost impossible (see jag, toyota etc).
Those times are gone.
Whoever the entrant they'll have to work hard just to be ahead of Jordan IMO.
climb is offline  
__________________
You got to learn how to fall, before you learn to fly
P.Simon
Quote
Old 6 Oct 2004, 10:30 (Ref:1116689)   #3
BootsOntheSide
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
England
Eastbourne, England
Posts: 13,000
BootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Climb, I think sonic was referring to the last time they built a car to race - the Scuderia Italia cars of the early 90s - which were actually much mroe successful than the team's Lola-built car in 1993. In any case, Harvey Postlethwaite's death was shortly after the team decided to pull the plug - essentially he'd used up all his efforts and commitment in trying to persuade them to continue with the project.

One way or another, it's imperative that there are 3 or 4 private teams on the grid next year. It's probably time some sort of B class was introduced, either for non-works teams or for year-old or off-the-shelf chassis.
BootsOntheSide is offline  
Quote
Old 6 Oct 2004, 10:38 (Ref:1116700)   #4
Kicking-back
Registered User
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
Kicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridKicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Lets hope this happens - so we have 20 cars on the grid from 10 teams in 2005.

I'm all in favour of customer cars being available from 2006 - but they should just race for overall plaudits, rather than a class B as Boots suggests.
Kicking-back is offline  
Quote
Old 6 Oct 2004, 11:48 (Ref:1116787)   #5
dcp2685
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location:
Washington DC
Posts: 600
dcp2685 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I like the B-Class idea personally. It would give it a lemans type feel a bit. Definately an interesting idea but i think we'd need to have more than 20 cars to make it work and went back to the old points scoring system for each class.
dcp2685 is offline  
Quote
Old 6 Oct 2004, 12:05 (Ref:1116811)   #6
climb
Veteran
 
climb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
St Pierre and Miquelon
closer than you thought!
Posts: 4,512
climb should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridclimb should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by BootsOntheSide
Climb, I think sonic was referring to the last time they built a car to race - the Scuderia Italia cars of the early 90s - which were actually much mroe successful than the team's Lola-built car in 1993....
If I'm not wrong (stats pundits like esorniloc could help me) Dallara started making chassis some year before, and manya time got the points; they must have taken a podium, also.
Something better than Minardi then (with all the respect for Minardi)
climb is offline  
__________________
You got to learn how to fall, before you learn to fly
P.Simon
Quote
Old 6 Oct 2004, 12:07 (Ref:1116813)   #7
ghinzani
Race Official
Veteran
 
ghinzani's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location:
Dorset & Cornwall
Posts: 4,010
ghinzani should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridghinzani should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Perhaps they could re-introduce the Jim Clark cup like they ran for Atmo 3.5ltr F1 cars in 1987?
ghinzani is offline  
__________________
Andretti, Mario: Auto racing legend owns the rights to an unspecified Spinal Tap song, which he purchased when former manager Ian Faith secretly sold the band’s catalog
Quote
Old 6 Oct 2004, 12:08 (Ref:1116814)   #8
Redlake27
Racer
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location:
Birmingham
Posts: 495
Redlake27 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Dallara had a string of good cars from 88 to 91. Caffi and DeCesaris were often regular points scorers and top ten qualifiers. They had a couple of podiums too.
Redlake27 is offline  
Quote
Old 6 Oct 2004, 12:38 (Ref:1116855)   #9
Kicking-back
Registered User
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
Kicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridKicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
The problem with a "B" class is that the cars would be running to the same rules - it would just be a false situation.

One of the appeals of top class single seater racing is that everyone's running for the same prize.

The class system has its benefits, but these are well showcased in sportscar racing.
Kicking-back is offline  
Quote
Old 6 Oct 2004, 13:23 (Ref:1116913)   #10
mark_l
Veteran
 
mark_l's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
England
Posts: 1,646
mark_l should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridmark_l should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Does the rule still exist that the entrant of the car must be the manufacturer of the car?
mark_l is offline  
Quote
Old 6 Oct 2004, 13:25 (Ref:1116918)   #11
BootsOntheSide
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
England
Eastbourne, England
Posts: 13,000
BootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
I was certainly thinking in terms of old cars being eligible for the main points. Having a B class championship would be an extra honour for those drivers and teams to race for, as a way of attrracting attention to them, for the sake of gaining sponsorship.

Mark, when was that rule added? As recently as 10 years ago teams ran cars built by outside suppliers.

Last edited by BootsOntheSide; 6 Oct 2004 at 13:32.
BootsOntheSide is offline  
Quote
Old 6 Oct 2004, 13:30 (Ref:1116926)   #12
Kicking-back
Registered User
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
Kicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridKicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by mark_l
Does the rule still exist that the entrant of the car must be the manufacturer of the car?

I don't think that's the rule.

I think it's that each team must run a unique car.


For example Larrousse ran Lola chassis for a few years before making their own.
Kicking-back is offline  
Quote
Old 6 Oct 2004, 14:16 (Ref:1116982)   #13
climb
Veteran
 
climb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
St Pierre and Miquelon
closer than you thought!
Posts: 4,512
climb should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridclimb should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by mark_l
Does the rule still exist that the entrant of the car must be the manufacturer of the car?
Then only Ferrari Renault, Jag and Toyota would be allowed to race
climb is offline  
__________________
You got to learn how to fall, before you learn to fly
P.Simon
Quote
Old 6 Oct 2004, 14:25 (Ref:1116998)   #14
Kicking-back
Registered User
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
Kicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridKicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Why?

McLaren, Williams, Jordan, Minardi, BAR and Sauber all manufacture their own chassis.
Kicking-back is offline  
Quote
Old 6 Oct 2004, 14:27 (Ref:1117000)   #15
Logrence
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Wales
Posts: 2,299
Logrence should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by climb
Then only Ferrari Renault, Jag and Toyota would be allowed to race
Well no, Minardi still build their own F1 car, they're just not a car manufacturer.

Personally I think they should get rid of Minardi and Jordan quick - I'd quite like to see 3 car teams fighting it out. Nothing wrong with a field of 24 competitive cars...
Logrence is offline  
Quote
Old 6 Oct 2004, 14:36 (Ref:1117008)   #16
Kicking-back
Registered User
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
Kicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridKicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Get rid of Minardi and Jordan?

Its teams like that we need to safeguard, to ensure F1 has a future if and when manufacturers get fed up.
Kicking-back is offline  
Quote
Old 6 Oct 2004, 14:42 (Ref:1117013)   #17
Logrence
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Wales
Posts: 2,299
Logrence should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Still say get rid of them. Leeches on what could otherwise be a more competitive, more exciting sport.

It's like some having some old nag tool around at the back of the track at Ascot, just in case all the other horses decided they'd rather be sausages in France.

There will always been some other sucker to buy up the teams when the big boys move on to another sandpit.
Logrence is offline  
Quote
Old 6 Oct 2004, 14:51 (Ref:1117025)   #18
Kicking-back
Registered User
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
Kicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridKicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Leeches?

I don't really understand that.

How would you propose "getting rid" of them?
Kicking-back is offline  
Quote
Old 6 Oct 2004, 14:57 (Ref:1117035)   #19
climb
Veteran
 
climb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
St Pierre and Miquelon
closer than you thought!
Posts: 4,512
climb should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridclimb should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by Kicking-back
Why?

McLaren, Williams, Jordan, Minardi, BAR and Sauber all manufacture their own chassis.
Of course when I talk about a "car" I mean a complete car not barely the chassis.

Unless you think the engine's a secondary optional....

Macs, Williams, etc don't make their own engine.
climb is offline  
__________________
You got to learn how to fall, before you learn to fly
P.Simon
Quote
Old 6 Oct 2004, 16:28 (Ref:1117133)   #20
sonic
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location:
London
Posts: 729
sonic should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by Kicking-back
Leeches?

I don't really understand that.

How would you propose "getting rid" of them?
burn them off with a lighter.
sonic is offline  
Quote
Old 6 Oct 2004, 16:49 (Ref:1117155)   #21
Kicking-back
Registered User
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
Kicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridKicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Well, they already tried that in the pit lane at Monza....
Kicking-back is offline  
Quote
Old 7 Oct 2004, 13:15 (Ref:1118014)   #22
BootsOntheSide
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
England
Eastbourne, England
Posts: 13,000
BootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
How does less teams equal more competition? All that 3 car teams would eman is another Ferrari to beat, following 'team orders'. Jordan and Minardi have given F1 some of its greatest moments, and are a link to the days when the sport had a soul and passion of its own, rather than just being seen as a marketing tool.
BootsOntheSide is offline  
Quote
Old 7 Oct 2004, 14:46 (Ref:1118077)   #23
raul_iulian
Racer
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Romania
Arad, Romania
Posts: 349
raul_iulian has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
That will be so nice... But without a engine manufacturer to back them up, well i don't think that will ever happend!
raul_iulian is offline  
__________________
link@me
Quote
Old 7 Oct 2004, 15:35 (Ref:1118127)   #24
climb
Veteran
 
climb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
St Pierre and Miquelon
closer than you thought!
Posts: 4,512
climb should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridclimb should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Back to topic, the main italian newspaper, Corriere della Sera, is expected to host an interview to the entrant team owner; as soon as I get that feature, I'll refer you.
climb is offline  
__________________
You got to learn how to fall, before you learn to fly
P.Simon
Quote
Old 7 Oct 2004, 15:53 (Ref:1118149)   #25
billiaml
Racer
 
billiaml's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
United States
Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, USA
Posts: 174
billiaml should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I read somewhere that there's supposed to be some kind of an announcement @ Japan this weekend. Hopefully, that will put an end to this speculation. Then we can get on to speculating about who's going to design the chassis, who's going to drive, where they'll end up in the grid ... important stuff...

Last edited by billiaml; 7 Oct 2004 at 15:54.
billiaml is offline  
__________________
Can I help it if I think you're funny when you're mad?
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Team GOH not in LMES 2005 HJC Sportscar & GT Racing 18 1 Dec 2004 17:14
[Rumour?] Team RedBull-Ecclestone-Toyota KevinS Formula One 14 30 Sep 2004 15:28
Rumour: New team for 2005? 429CJ Formula One 16 4 Jun 2003 10:58


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:09.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.